Burn D J, Sawle G V, Brooks D J
MRC Cyclotron Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;57(3):278-84. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.3.278.
Clinicopathological series indicate that the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease is correct in only 80% of cases. Multiple system atrophy (MSA) and Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (SRO) comprise most of the misdiagnoses. By means of 18F-dopa PET the pattern of nigrostriatal dopaminergic dysfunction in 28 patients with clinically probable Parkinson's disease, 25 with MSA, and 10 patients with SRO, was assessed and compared with the pattern in 27 normal subjects. Discriminant function analysis was used to assess the ability of 18F-dopa PET to categorize individual parkinsonian patients on the basis of their caudate and putamen tracer uptake. Discriminant function analysis assigned all control subjects a normal category. One Parkinsonian patient out of 63 was classified as "normal" on the basis of PET findings, although this patient had significantly reduced putamen 18F-dopa uptake. Discriminant function analysis was less effective at distinguishing different categories of akinetic-rigid syndrome on the basis of their striatal 18F-dopa uptake, as judged against clinical criteria. Patients clinically labelled as having typical or atypical Parkinsonian syndromes were assigned the same category on PET criteria 64% and 69% of the time, respectively. When all three categories of Parkinson's disease, MSA, and SRO were considered together, clinical and 18F-dopa PET findings correlated in 64% of patients assigned a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and 70% of those given a diagnosis of SRO; MSA was less readily discriminated, patients with MSA being assigned to MSA, Parkinson's disease, and SRO groups with equal frequency. The correlation between clinical and discriminant function analysis assignment improved when separate comparisons were made between Parkinson's disease and MSA, or Parkinson's disease and SRO groups. In these analyses, clinical and PET categorisation of MSA and Parkinson's disease agreed in 60% of cases, and of SRO and Parkinson's disease in 90% of cases. In summary, (18)F-dopa PET successfully discriminates normal subjects from parkinsonian patients, and patients with Parkinson's disease from patients with SRO, but is less reliable in distinguishing Parkinson's disease from MSA. The concomitant assessment of striatal neuronal function with additional PET tracers may be necessary to reliably differentiate typical and atypical parkinsonian syndromes.
临床病理系列研究表明,帕金森病的临床诊断在仅80%的病例中是正确的。多系统萎缩(MSA)和斯蒂尔-理查森-奥尔谢夫斯基综合征(SRO)构成了大部分误诊情况。通过18F-多巴PET,对28例临床疑似帕金森病患者、25例MSA患者和10例SRO患者的黑质纹状体多巴胺能功能障碍模式进行了评估,并与27名正常受试者的模式进行了比较。判别函数分析用于评估18F-多巴PET根据尾状核和壳核示踪剂摄取情况对个体帕金森病患者进行分类的能力。判别函数分析将所有对照受试者归为正常类别。63例帕金森病患者中有1例根据PET结果被归类为“正常”,尽管该患者壳核18F-多巴摄取显著降低。与临床标准相比,判别函数分析在根据纹状体18F-多巴摄取区分不同类型的运动不能-强直综合征方面效果较差。临床诊断为典型或非典型帕金森综合征的患者,分别有64%和69%的时间根据PET标准被归为同一类别。当将帕金森病、MSA和SRO这三类疾病一起考虑时,临床和18F-多巴PET结果在64%被诊断为帕金森病的患者和70%被诊断为SRO的患者中具有相关性;MSA较难区分,MSA患者被同等频率地分配到MSA、帕金森病和SRO组。当分别对帕金森病与MSA组或帕金森病与SRO组进行比较时,临床与判别函数分析分类之间的相关性有所提高。在这些分析中,MSA和帕金森病的临床与PET分类在60%的病例中一致,SRO和帕金森病的临床与PET分类在90%的病例中一致。总之,18F-多巴PET成功地将正常受试者与帕金森病患者区分开来,也能将帕金森病患者与SRO患者区分开来,但在区分帕金森病与MSA方面可靠性较低。可能需要用额外的PET示踪剂同时评估纹状体神经元功能,以可靠地区分典型和非典型帕金森综合征。