Taylor J J
Med Sci Law. 1994 Jan;34(1):78-9. doi: 10.1177/002580249403400113.
A case is described in which, due to long-term repeated exposure to the same body of diatom-containing water, comparable diatom findings in the tissues and environmental samples were not acceptable as proof of drowning. A commonly overlooked pitfall limiting the value of acid-digestion in marine cases is emphasized.
本文描述了一个案例，由于长期反复接触同一含有硅藻的水体，组织和环境样本中相似的硅藻发现不能作为溺水的证据。强调了在海洋案例中限制酸消化价值的一个常被忽视的陷阱。
