• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗对医疗保健系统的影响。

The impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy on health care systems.

作者信息

Saksena S

机构信息

Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Service, University of Medicine and Dentistry-New Jersey Medical School.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1193-200. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90109-0.

DOI:10.1016/0002-8703(94)90109-0
PMID:8160600
Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are now widely used for the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and are being offered as a primary preventive therapy. This technology has potential for significant fiscal impact on health care budgets. Technologic innovation will result in more complex devices that are more effective and better accepted by patients and physicians. The clinical impact of these devices will be predicated, in part, by absolute survival benefits but also by their relative advantages over alternative therapies in terms of survival, safety, morbidity, quality of life, and cost. The impact on public health will depend on the effectiveness of screening methods for identification of populations likely to benefit from primary prevention. Risk stratification algorithms are now being tested in several ongoing clinical trials. Dilution of benefit by competing illnesses may occur to different extents in individual patient populations. The economic impact is predicated on the future cost of ICD systems, limitation of hospitalization costs associated with this therapy, and accurate prospective stratification in primary prevention populations. Cost efficacy analyses and quality of life assessment in ongoing and future clinical trials are essential to the development of this therapy and its diffusion into different health care systems. Achievement of clinical benefits, functional independence, and a return to gainful employment by patients will be important determinants of the support lent by health care systems to the dissemination of this therapy.

摘要

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)目前广泛用于心脏性猝死的二级预防,并正被用作一级预防疗法。这项技术可能会对医疗保健预算产生重大财政影响。技术创新将带来更复杂的设备,这些设备更有效且更容易被患者和医生接受。这些设备的临床影响部分将取决于绝对生存获益,也取决于它们在生存、安全性、发病率、生活质量和成本方面相对于替代疗法的相对优势。对公共卫生的影响将取决于用于识别可能从一级预防中获益人群的筛查方法的有效性。风险分层算法目前正在多项正在进行的临床试验中进行测试。在个体患者群体中,竞争性疾病对获益的稀释可能会在不同程度上发生。经济影响取决于ICD系统的未来成本、与该疗法相关的住院成本的限制以及一级预防人群中的准确前瞻性分层。正在进行的和未来的临床试验中的成本效益分析和生活质量评估对于这种疗法的发展及其在不同医疗保健系统中的推广至关重要。患者实现临床获益、功能独立并恢复有报酬的工作将是医疗保健系统支持这种疗法传播的重要决定因素。

相似文献

1
The impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy on health care systems.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗对医疗保健系统的影响。
Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1193-200. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90109-0.
2
Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon.延长器械寿命对植入式心脏转复除颤器治疗长期成本的影响:具有 15 年时间范围的建模研究。
Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1453-62. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut133. Epub 2013 May 21.
3
Economic implications and cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy.植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗的经济意义和成本效益。
Heart Fail Clin. 2011 Apr;7(2):241-50, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2010.12.007.
4
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death after infected implantable cardioverter-defibrillator removal: A cost-effectiveness evaluation.可穿戴除颤器预防感染性植入式心脏复律除颤器移除后心脏性猝死的成本效益评估。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.061. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Effect of risk stratification on cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.风险分层对植入式心脏复律除颤器成本效益的影响。
Am Heart J. 2002 Sep;144(3):440-8. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.125501.
6
Cost-benefit analysis of preventing sudden cardiac deaths with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus amiodarone.植入式心脏复律除颤器与胺碘酮预防心源性猝死的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;10(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00140.x.
7
The cost effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review of economic evaluations.植入式心脏复律除颤器的成本效益:经济评价的系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Feb;12(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0069-2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients >or=65 years of age.>or= 表示大于等于,因此译文为: 植入式心脏复律除颤器在年龄大于等于 65 岁患者中的成本效益。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.021.
9
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器的成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 6;353(14):1471-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa051989.
10
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的成本效益
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jan;13(1 Suppl):S114-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2002.tb01964.x.