van der Burg M P, Guicherit O R, Frölich M, Scherft J P, Prins F A, Bruijn J A, Gooszen H G
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cell Transplant. 1994 Jan-Feb;3(1):91-101. doi: 10.1177/096368979400300113.
The outcome of islet isolation is considered uncertain because of the large variability of islet and insulin yield, but comparison of the isolated and native islet population has not been attempted. We therefore addressed the efficacy of collagenase digestion, and density gradient purification of islets from the splenic dog pancreas (n = 31) by morphometry of the islet volume and size distribution, and by extraction of insulin and amylase, in samples from the pancreas, the digest, and gradient fractions. In contrast to a approximately 90% recovery of pancreatic insulin and amylase after digestion, islet yield amounted to 50% of the islet content of the pancreas. After density separation, islets were mainly found in the purified fractions, while half of the recovered insulin was located in the acinar fraction of the gradients-indicating a substantial proportion of islets entrapped in acinar fragments. The islet and insulin content of the pancreas correlated well with islet and insulin yield after digestion (r = 0.7, p < .0001). The insulin content of digest suspensions did neither correlate with islet nor insulin recovery in the purified fraction of the gradients (r = 0.4) as opposed to the islet content of digest suspensions, which correlated with both (r = 0.7, p < .0001). After density separation near 100% purity was obtained, and no loss of insulin from isolated islets was demonstrated by extraction and microscopy. Size distributions of native and isolated islets demonstrated no fragmentation. We conclude that the variability of isolation outcome may be attributed to a large extent to the variability of the native endocrine pancreas. Isolation efficacy was best documented by morphometry, because insulin extraction did not discriminate between free and entrapped islets. However, assessment by both morphometry and extraction allowed the quantitation of entrapped islets, and demonstrated preservation of beta-cell granulation. Similar studies should facilitate the analysis of other factors affecting islet isolation in man.
由于胰岛和胰岛素产量的巨大变异性,胰岛分离的结果被认为是不确定的,但尚未尝试对分离的胰岛群体与天然胰岛群体进行比较。因此,我们通过对胰岛体积和大小分布进行形态测量,并从胰腺、消化液和梯度级分的样本中提取胰岛素和淀粉酶,探讨了胶原酶消化以及从犬脾脏胰腺(n = 31)中进行密度梯度纯化胰岛的效果。与消化后胰腺胰岛素和淀粉酶约90%的回收率相比,胰岛产量仅为胰腺中胰岛含量的50%。密度分离后,胰岛主要存在于纯化级分中,而回收胰岛素的一半位于梯度的腺泡级分中,这表明相当一部分胰岛被困在腺泡碎片中。胰腺的胰岛和胰岛素含量与消化后的胰岛和胰岛素产量密切相关(r = 0.7,p <.0001)。消化液悬浮液中的胰岛素含量与梯度纯化级分中的胰岛回收率和胰岛素回收率均无相关性(r = 0.4),而消化液悬浮液中的胰岛含量与两者均相关(r = 0.7,p <.0001)。密度分离后获得了接近100%的纯度,并且通过提取和显微镜检查未发现分离的胰岛有胰岛素损失。天然胰岛和分离胰岛的大小分布未显示出碎片化。我们得出结论,分离结果的变异性在很大程度上可能归因于天然内分泌胰腺的变异性。形态测量最能证明分离效果,因为胰岛素提取无法区分游离胰岛和被困胰岛。然而,通过形态测量和提取进行评估可以对被困胰岛进行定量,并证明β细胞颗粒的保存。类似的研究应有助于分析影响人类胰岛分离的其他因素。