Karpel J P, Kotch A, Zinny M, Pesin J, Alleyne W
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Chest. 1994 Apr;105(4):1089-94. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.4.1089.
To evaluate the role of inhaled ipratropium bromide alone vs oral theophylline plus inhaled beta-agonist or the combination of all three in patients with stable COPD, the following double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Forty-eight patients with stable COPD (mean age, 61.8 years, with mean baseline FEV1 < 1.0 L) were randomized on four separate days to receive the following drug regimens: (1) theophylline tablets (dose previously determined to result in blood level of 12 to 18 mg/L), followed by inhaled albuterol (2 puffs via metered-dose inhaler [MDI]), followed by inhaled placebo (2 puffs via MDI); (2) oral placebo followed by ipratropium (2 puffs via MDI; 36 micrograms), followed by inhaled placebo; (3) oral theophylline, followed by albuterol, followed by ipratropium; or (4) oral placebo followed by two inhaled placebos. On study days, spirometry and heart rate were measured at time 0, 30 min, 60 min, and hourly for 6 h. The FEV1 peak change (liters) and area under the curve (liter x hours) for the treatment groups were compared. Ipratropium was more effective than placebo (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0078, respectively). The combination of albuterol and theophylline was superior to ipratropium alone (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0001, respectively), and all three drugs together were superior to the combination of albuterol and theophylline (p = 0.0373 and p = 0.0289), respectively; one-sided test of hypotheses). Peak heart rates were significantly higher for treatment groups compared with placebo groups (p = 0.0001). However, theophylline and albuterol and the combination of all three drugs resulted in greater peak heart rates than did ipratropium alone (p = 0.001). These data suggest that for patients with stable COPD, combination therapy with ipratropium (two puffs), theophylline, and albuterol (two puffs) is superior to ipratropium alone or the combination of theophylline and albuterol.
为评估单独吸入异丙托溴铵与口服氨茶碱加吸入β受体激动剂或三者联合使用对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的作用,进行了以下双盲、安慰剂对照研究。48例稳定期COPD患者(平均年龄61.8岁,平均基线第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]<1.0L)在四个不同日期随机分组,接受以下药物治疗方案:(1)氨茶碱片(剂量预先确定,以使血药浓度达到12至18mg/L),随后吸入沙丁胺醇(通过定量吸入器[MDI]喷2次),再吸入安慰剂(通过MDI喷2次);(2)口服安慰剂,随后吸入异丙托溴铵(通过MDI喷2次;36μg),再吸入安慰剂;(3)口服氨茶碱,随后吸入沙丁胺醇,再吸入异丙托溴铵;或(4)口服安慰剂,随后吸入两次安慰剂。在研究日,于0、30分钟、60分钟及之后每小时测量一次肺功能和心率,共测量6小时。比较各治疗组的FEV1峰值变化(升)和曲线下面积(升×小时)。异丙托溴铵比安慰剂更有效(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.0078)。沙丁胺醇和氨茶碱联合使用优于单独使用异丙托溴铵(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.0001),三种药物联合使用优于沙丁胺醇和氨茶碱联合使用(分别为p = 0.0373和p = 0.0289;单侧假设检验)。治疗组的峰值心率显著高于安慰剂组(p = 0.0001)。然而,氨茶碱和沙丁胺醇以及三种药物联合使用导致的峰值心率高于单独使用异丙托溴铵(p = 0.001)。这些数据表明,对于稳定期COPD患者,异丙托溴铵(喷2次)、氨茶碱和沙丁胺醇(喷2次)联合治疗优于单独使用异丙托溴铵或氨茶碱与沙丁胺醇联合使用。