Suppr超能文献

改革国民医疗服务体系的改革措施。

Reforming the NHS reforms.

作者信息

Macara A W

机构信息

British Medical Association, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994 Mar 26;308(6932):848-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6932.848.

Abstract

Rather than improving efficiency, the reforms imposed on the NHS have increased bureaucracy, reduced patient choice, limited the range of core services, and led to inequity of treatment. In this paper I examine how the medical profession might help to solve these problems. Priorities must be set for health care since no government can afford all the possibilities offered by medical science. It is essential to forge a consensus of patients, carers, professionals, the public, and government if a system of priorities is to be equitable and just. We also need to be able to measure quality of outcome in health care. This requires consensus on what is the desired outcome and the development of appropriate guidelines, audit, and performance review. This is primarily a task for the health professions supported by management and by adequate investment. Basically, the government must reinstate the three traditional values of the NHS--equity, consensus, and regard for representative professional advice.

摘要

强加给国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的改革非但没有提高效率,反而增加了官僚作风,减少了患者的选择,限制了核心服务的范围,并导致了治疗的不公平。在本文中,我探讨了医疗行业如何可能有助于解决这些问题。必须为医疗保健设定优先事项,因为没有哪个政府能够承担医学所提供的所有可能性。如果要使优先事项体系公平公正,就必须在患者、护理人员、专业人员、公众和政府之间达成共识。我们还需要能够衡量医疗保健的结果质量。这需要就期望的结果达成共识,并制定适当的指导方针、审计和绩效评估。这主要是医疗行业在管理和充足投资的支持下的任务。基本上,政府必须恢复国民医疗服务体系的三个传统价值观——公平、共识以及对具有代表性的专业建议的尊重。

相似文献

1
Reforming the NHS reforms.
BMJ. 1994 Mar 26;308(6932):848-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6932.848.
2
Liberating the NHS? A commentary on the Lansley White Paper, "Equity and Excellence".
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):815-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.020. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
3
Renewing the National Health Service: Labour's agenda for a healthier Britain.
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(2):269-308. doi: 10.2190/G3U1-M3WK-MDC6-3Q94.
6
New labour and Britain's National Health Service: an overview of current reforms.
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(2):309-34. doi: 10.2190/53PU-DW4C-5KY5-8WYX.
7
Commissioning for equity in the NHS: rhetoric and practice.
Br Med Bull. 2015 Sep;115(1):5-17. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldv031. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
A view on NHS reforms.
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Sep-Oct;29(5):442-5.
9
Reforming the NHS in England: opportunities and challenges.
Med Leg J. 2013;81(Pt 1):2-17. doi: 10.1177/0025817212472855.
10
Evaluating the Labour Government's English NHS health system reforms: the 2008 Darzi reforms.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Oct;18(2 Suppl):1-10. doi: 10.1177/1355819613499323.

引用本文的文献

1
Saving Medicare. Is privatization the answer?
Can Fam Physician. 1996 Nov;42:2114-6, 2125-8.
2
The alluring myth of private medicine.
CMAJ. 1996 Aug 15;155(4):404-6.
3
Ethics of rationing health care services.
BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):261-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.261c.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons from the financial scandals in Wessex and the West Midlands.
BMJ. 1994 Jan 22;308(6923):215-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6923.215.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验