Macara A W
British Medical Association, London.
BMJ. 1994 Mar 26;308(6932):848-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6932.848.
Rather than improving efficiency, the reforms imposed on the NHS have increased bureaucracy, reduced patient choice, limited the range of core services, and led to inequity of treatment. In this paper I examine how the medical profession might help to solve these problems. Priorities must be set for health care since no government can afford all the possibilities offered by medical science. It is essential to forge a consensus of patients, carers, professionals, the public, and government if a system of priorities is to be equitable and just. We also need to be able to measure quality of outcome in health care. This requires consensus on what is the desired outcome and the development of appropriate guidelines, audit, and performance review. This is primarily a task for the health professions supported by management and by adequate investment. Basically, the government must reinstate the three traditional values of the NHS--equity, consensus, and regard for representative professional advice.
强加给国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的改革非但没有提高效率,反而增加了官僚作风,减少了患者的选择,限制了核心服务的范围,并导致了治疗的不公平。在本文中,我探讨了医疗行业如何可能有助于解决这些问题。必须为医疗保健设定优先事项,因为没有哪个政府能够承担医学所提供的所有可能性。如果要使优先事项体系公平公正,就必须在患者、护理人员、专业人员、公众和政府之间达成共识。我们还需要能够衡量医疗保健的结果质量。这需要就期望的结果达成共识,并制定适当的指导方针、审计和绩效评估。这主要是医疗行业在管理和充足投资的支持下的任务。基本上,政府必须恢复国民医疗服务体系的三个传统价值观——公平、共识以及对具有代表性的专业建议的尊重。