• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性实验性胰腺炎中抗生素的生物利用度

Antibiotics bioavailability in acute experimental pancreatitis.

作者信息

Trudel J L, Wittnich C, Brown R A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1994 May;178(5):475-9.

PMID:8167885
Abstract

Pancreatic sepsis in acute pancreatitis is the most lethal complication of the disease. This study was done to create a rational basis for the choice of antibiotics used in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. We postulated that, unless the antibiotics were present in therapeutic concentrations in the pancreatic tissue during pancreatitis, their use was of no value. Six mongrel dogs were used to test each antibiotic, each dog acting as its own control. The doses were based on the weight of the dogs: 15.0 milligrams per kilogram of clindamycin; 50.0 milligrams per kilogram of chloramphenicol; 10.0 milligrams per kilogram of metronidazole; 5.0 milligrams per kilogram of gentamicin; 12.5 milligrams per kilogram of cefazolin, and 50.0 milligrams per kilogram of ampicillin. Baseline serum and pancreatic tissue levels were obtained after intravenous injection of the antibiotics. Bile-trypsin hemorrhagic pancreatitis was induced one week later, and the serum and pancreatic tissue level antibiotics were measured again. The results showed significant differences in bioactive levels of antibiotics between blood and the pancreas. Ampicillin, gentamicin and cefazolin reached therapeutic blood levels, but did not achieve a parallel therapeutic level in the normal pancreatic tissue or during pancreatitis. Only three of the antibiotics tested, clindamycin, metronidazole and chloramphenicol, achieved therapeutic tissue penetrance in the normal and inflamed pancreas. After 1982, based on these results, clindamycin became our prophylactic antibiotic of choice in instances of acute severe pancreatitis. This resulted in the eradication of Bacteroides as a cause of pancreatic sepsis between 1980 and 1985. In 1993, our recommendation is to use a broad-spectrum gram-negative and gram-positive antibiotic with good penetration of the pancreatic tissue, such as cefotaxime or imipenem.

摘要

急性胰腺炎中的胰腺脓毒症是该疾病最致命的并发症。本研究旨在为治疗重症急性胰腺炎时抗生素的选择建立合理依据。我们推测,除非在胰腺炎期间抗生素在胰腺组织中达到治疗浓度,否则使用它们毫无价值。使用6只杂种狗来测试每种抗生素,每只狗自身作为对照。剂量根据狗的体重确定:每千克体重15.0毫克克林霉素;每千克体重50.0毫克氯霉素;每千克体重10.0毫克甲硝唑;每千克体重5.0毫克庆大霉素;每千克体重12.5毫克头孢唑林,以及每千克体重50.0毫克氨苄西林。静脉注射抗生素后获取基线血清和胰腺组织水平。一周后诱发胆胰蛋白酶性出血性胰腺炎,再次测量血清和胰腺组织中的抗生素水平。结果显示血液和胰腺中抗生素的生物活性水平存在显著差异。氨苄西林、庆大霉素和头孢唑林达到了治疗性血液水平,但在正常胰腺组织或胰腺炎期间未达到相应的治疗水平。所测试的抗生素中只有三种,即克林霉素、甲硝唑和氯霉素,在正常和发炎的胰腺中实现了治疗性组织穿透。1982年后,基于这些结果,克林霉素成为我们在急性重症胰腺炎病例中预防性使用的首选抗生素。这导致在1980年至1985年间消灭了作为胰腺脓毒症病因的拟杆菌。1993年,我们建议使用一种对胰腺组织有良好穿透性的广谱革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性抗生素,如头孢噻肟或亚胺培南。

相似文献

1
Antibiotics bioavailability in acute experimental pancreatitis.急性实验性胰腺炎中抗生素的生物利用度
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 May;178(5):475-9.
2
Plasma beta-endorphin and the effect of naloxone on hemodynamic changes during experimental acute pancreatitis in dogs.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 May;168(5):402-6.
3
[Pancreatic penetration of antibiotics].[抗生素在胰腺中的渗透情况]
Chirurg. 1991 Apr;62(4):317-22.
4
Penetration of cefotaxime into the pancreas.头孢噻肟在胰腺中的渗透情况。
Z Gastroenterol. 1983 Oct;21(10):601-3.
5
[Prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis. Results from a consensus conference].[急性胰腺炎中的预防性抗生素。共识会议结果]
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1997 Oct;89(10):781-5.
6
The weak evidence base for antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎抗生素预防性治疗的证据基础薄弱。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Nov-Dec;55(88):2233-7.
7
Antibiotics and pancreatitis.抗生素与胰腺炎
Gastroenterologist. 1997 Jun;5(2):157-64.
8
The utilization of antibiotics in the management of acute pancreatitis--experience from one transitional country university hospital.抗生素在急性胰腺炎治疗中的应用——来自一个转型国家大学医院的经验
Coll Antropol. 2008 Dec;32(4):1189-94.
9
[Experimental study on the therapeutic effects of SMS201-995 on bile-induced acute pancreatitis in the dog].[SMS201-995对犬胆汁性急性胰腺炎治疗作用的实验研究]
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1998 Jan;73(1):37-46.
10
Ghrelin attenuates the development of acute pancreatitis in rat.胃饥饿素可减轻大鼠急性胰腺炎的发展。
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;54(4):561-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Compositional and drug-resistance profiling of pathogens in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.重症急性胰腺炎患者病原体的成分分析及耐药性分析:一项回顾性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01563-x.
2
Aplysin Retards Pancreatic Necrosis and Inflammatory Responses in NOD Mice by Stabilizing Intestinal Barriers and Regulating Gut Microbial Composition.阿朴脂通过稳定肠道屏障和调节肠道微生物组成来延缓 NOD 小鼠的胰腺坏死和炎症反应。
Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Aug 1;2020:1280130. doi: 10.1155/2020/1280130. eCollection 2020.
3
Prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis: endless debate.
急性胰腺炎中的预防性抗生素:无休止的争论。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Feb;99(2):107-112. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0355. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
4
Antibiosis of Necrotizing Pancreatitis.坏死性胰腺炎的抗生作用
Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Oct;30(5):318-24. doi: 10.1159/000367948.
5
Changes in antibiotic distribution due to pancreatitis.抗生素分布因胰腺炎而改变。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jun;55(6):3008-11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00416-10. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
6
Questions about the use of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis.关于急性胰腺炎中抗生素使用的问题。
World J Emerg Surg. 2006 Jul 4;1:20. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-20.
7
Infectious complications of pancreatitis: diagnosis and management.胰腺炎的感染性并发症:诊断与管理
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2004 Aug;6(4):280-6. doi: 10.1007/s11894-004-0079-1.
8
Optimising outcomes in acute pancreatitis.优化急性胰腺炎的治疗结果。
Drugs. 2001;61(11):1581-91. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161110-00005.
9
Role of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis.抗生素在急性胰腺炎中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Nov-Dec;2(6):496-503. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80048-6.