Stanley J C
Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg Center, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Ciba Found Symp. 1993;178:119-34; discussion 134-8.
Since 1971 the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) at Johns Hopkins University has pioneered in discovery of and provision of educational help for 12-year-old boys and girls who reason better mathematically than 99% of other 12-year-olds. SMPY originated widespread searches for such youths and special academic classes for them outside the regular school system. A regional talent search, verbal as well as mathematical, now covers all 50 states of the USA, and many varied residential summer programmes are offered across the country. These have provided educational facilitation for many thousands, and have encouraged greater curricular flexibility in schools and better articulation of in-school with out-of-school learning experiences. From the first talent search conducted by SMPY in 1972, it became obvious that boys tend to score considerably higher than girls on the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test-Mathematical (SAT-M), a test intended mainly for college-bound 17- and 18-year-olds. This difference was reported in 1974 but attracted little attention until a controversial report in 1980 stimulated research on sex differences in various aspects of mathematics. Here I describe a study of sex differences over 10 years on 14 College Board high school achievement tests, which are taken (three usually) by bright 17- and 18-year-olds seeking admission to the USA's selective colleges and universities. Among the high scores on the European history test the ratio of males to females was greatest, 6:1. The next most sex-differentiating test was physics, 2.9:1, followed by elementary-level mathematics (mainly algebra and geometry), 2.5:1. Other ratios favouring males were, in 1991, chemistry (2.4:1), American history (2.1:1), biology (1.8:1), precalculus mathematics (1.6:1), Latin (1.6:1), French (1.4:1), modern Hebrew (1.1:1) and German (1.02:1). Tests in which more females were high scorers were literature (1.26:1), English composition (1.05:1) and Spanish (1.01:1). The largest sex differences on other standardized tests, for mechanical reasoning and spatial rotation, favour males. There are even larger differences for self-reported evaluative attitudes, with the theoretical value high for boys and the aesthetic high for girls. Such value scores correlated strangely with scores on achievement and aptitude tests. By 12 or younger, bright boys and girls already show many of the cognitive sex differences found in 18-year-olds.
自1971年以来,约翰·霍普金斯大学的数学早慧青年研究(SMPY)率先发现了数学推理能力优于99%同龄人的12岁男孩和女孩,并为他们提供教育帮助。SMPY发起了广泛的搜索,寻找这类青年,并在常规学校系统之外为他们开设了特殊的学术课程。一项涵盖语言和数学的地区性人才选拔活动现已覆盖美国所有50个州,全国各地还提供了许多种类多样的寄宿制暑期课程。这些课程为成千上万的人提供了教育便利,也促使学校在课程设置上更具灵活性,并更好地衔接校内和校外的学习体验。从SMPY于1972年首次进行人才选拔开始,就很明显地发现,在主要针对准备上大学的17、18岁学生的大学理事会学术能力测验数学部分(SAT-M)中,男孩的得分往往比女孩高得多。这一差异在1974年就有报道,但直到1980年一份有争议的报告引发了对数学各方面性别差异的研究,才受到较少关注。在此,我描述一项对14项大学理事会高中成绩测试中性别差异的为期10年的研究,这些测试通常由17、18岁聪明的学生参加,他们希望进入美国的精英学院和大学。在欧洲历史测试的高分者中,男性与女性的比例最大,为6:1。其次性别差异最大的测试是物理,为2.9:1,接着是基础水平数学(主要是代数和几何),为2.5:1。1991年,其他有利于男性的比例分别是:化学(2.4:1)、美国历史(2.1:1)、生物学(1.8:1)、大学先修数学(1.6:1)、拉丁语(1.6:1)、法语(1.4:1)、现代希伯来语(1.1:1)和德语(1.02:1)。高分女性较多的测试是文学(1.26:1)、英语作文(1.05:1)和西班牙语(1.01:1)。在其他标准化测试中,机械推理和空间旋转方面的性别差异最大,男性占优。在自我报告的评价态度方面差异甚至更大,男孩的理论价值得分高,女孩的审美价值得分高。这些价值得分与成绩和能力倾向测试的分数有着奇怪地关联。到12岁或更小的时候,聪明的男孩和女孩就已经表现出许多在18岁时才发现的认知性别差异。
Ciba Found Symp. 1993
Encephale. 2003
Child Neuropsychol. 2009-5
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010-1-16