Suppr超能文献

[球周麻醉与球后麻醉联合面神经阻滞。技术、局部麻醉药及添加剂、运动阻滞和感觉阻滞、并发症]

[Peribulbar anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia with facial nerve block. Techniques, local anesthetics and additives, akinesia and sensory block, complications].

作者信息

Hessemer V

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik Giessen.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Feb;204(2):75-89. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035503.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retrobulbar anesthesia (RETRO), combined with a facial block, is the most frequently employed method of anesthesia in cataract surgery. There is, however, an increasing tendency to use peribulbar anesthesia (PERI), which is claimed to provide the same degree of anesthesia and akinesia as RETRO while reducing many of the complications.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Survey of the principal techniques of RETRO, facial block and PERI as well as of the most important local anesthetics and additives; quantitative investigation of resulting akinesia and sensory blockade; comparison of systemic and local complications (literature review).

TECHNIQUES OF LOCAL ANESTHESIA

A) RETRO: 1) Atkinson technique: injection within the orbital muscle cone, superonasal eye position during injection; 2) Unsöld technique: primary eye position during injection (advantage: lower risk of optic nerve lesion). - B) Facial block: 1) O'Brien technique: injection anterior to the tragus of the ear, just above the condyloid process of the mandible (disadvantage: frequently blockade of the upper portion only of the peripheral facial nerve); 2) Nadbath/Rehman technique (modified O'Brien block): injection just inferior to the earlobe (advantage: better orbicularis akinesia due to blockade of upper and lower portions of peripheral facial nerve); 3) van Lint technique: infiltration anesthesia at the temporal orbital margin, aiming at the short zygomatic branches of the facial nerve (disadvantage: bad orbicularis akinesia). - C) PERI: 1) Technique with two injections outside the muscle cone (inferotemporally and superonasally), just past the equator; 2) one-injection technique, mostly inferotemporally (disadvantage: worse akinesia).

LOCAL ANESTHETICS

A) Short and weak action: lidocaine and prilocaine; advantages: good tissue penetration, low toxicity. - B) Intermediate duration and potency of action: mepivacaine; advantage: pronounced vasoconstrictor activity, alternative to adrenaline. - C) Long and strong action: 1) etidocaine; advantage: pronounced motor blockade, particularly suitable for facial block; 2) bupivacaine; advantage: pronounced sensory blockade, excellent postoperative analgesia; disadvantage: relatively toxic (cave: cardiac and respiratory arrest). - D) Mixtures of local anesthetics: mostly lidocaine-bupivacaine mixture; combines the advantages short-onset action (lidocaine) and long-duration action (bupivacaine).

ADDITIVES TO LOCAL ANESTHETICS

Adrenaline: prolongs the action of local anesthetics with short and intermediate duration of action, reduces the incidence of hemorrhages and of intraoperative vitreous bulging. - Hyaluronidase: highly effective for prevention of vitreous bulging.

AKINESIA AND SENSORY BLOCKADE

In randomized order, 160 cataract patients received PERI (technique with 2 injections) with 6, 8 or 10 ml of a bupivacaine-lidocaine-hyaluronidase mixture (without facial block) or RETRO (Unsöld technique) with 5 ml of the above mixture, combined with a Nadbath/Rehman facial nerve block (5 ml etidocaine-lidocaine mixture). Measured 20 min after injection (intervening period of oculopression), the smallest ocular motility (Kestenbaum limbus test) was left after RETRO. After administration of PERI - even with a volume of 10 ml - the range of residual ocular motility was always higher, i.e., there was a less reliable globe akinesia than after RETRO. The lid closure force (Straub technique) averaged zero after all methods of anesthesia; however, the smallest spread (highest reliability) was observed after PERI. Complete corneal anesthesia (Draeger esthesiometer) was found in nearly all cases, i.e., RETRO and PERI are comparably effective concerning sensory blockade...

摘要

背景

球后麻醉(RETRO)联合面部阻滞是白内障手术中最常用的麻醉方法。然而,球周麻醉(PERI)的使用趋势日益增加,据称其能提供与RETRO相同程度的麻醉和眼球运动麻痹,同时减少许多并发症。

研究目的

调查RETRO、面部阻滞和PERI的主要技术以及最重要的局部麻醉药和添加剂;对产生的眼球运动麻痹和感觉阻滞进行定量研究;比较全身和局部并发症(文献综述)。

局部麻醉技术

A)RETRO:1)阿特金森技术:在眶肌圆锥内注射,注射时眼位于鼻上方;2)翁泽尔德技术:注射时眼处于原在位(优点:视神经损伤风险较低)。- B)面部阻滞:1)奥布赖恩技术:在耳屏前方、下颌骨髁突上方注射(缺点:常仅阻滞外周面神经的上部);2)纳德巴斯/雷曼技术(改良奥布赖恩阻滞):在耳垂下方注射(优点:由于阻滞外周面神经的上下部,眼轮匝肌运动麻痹效果更好);3)范林特技术:在颞侧眶缘进行浸润麻醉,目标是面神经的短颧支(缺点:眼轮匝肌运动麻痹效果差)。- C)PERI:1)在肌圆锥外(颞下和鼻上)、赤道后方进行两次注射的技术;2)单次注射技术,大多在颞下(缺点:眼球运动麻痹效果较差)。

局部麻醉药

A)作用时间短且弱:利多卡因和丙胺卡因;优点:组织穿透力好,毒性低。- B)作用时间和效力中等:甲哌卡因;优点:有明显的血管收缩活性,可替代肾上腺素。- C)作用时间长且强:1)依替卡因;优点:有明显的运动阻滞作用,特别适用于面部阻滞;2)布比卡因;优点:有明显的感觉阻滞作用,术后镇痛效果极佳;缺点:毒性相对较大(注意:可导致心脏和呼吸骤停)。- D)局部麻醉药混合物:大多为利多卡因 - 布比卡因混合物;结合了起效快(利多卡因)和作用时间长(布比卡因)的优点。

局部麻醉药添加剂

肾上腺素:延长作用时间短和中等的局部麻醉药的作用,减少出血和术中玻璃体突出的发生率。- 透明质酸酶:对预防玻璃体突出非常有效。

眼球运动麻痹和感觉阻滞

160例白内障患者按随机顺序接受PERI(两次注射技术),使用6、8或10毫升布比卡因 - 利多卡因 - 透明质酸酶混合物(不联合面部阻滞),或接受RETRO(翁泽尔德技术),使用上述混合物5毫升,并联合纳德巴斯/雷曼面神经阻滞(5毫升依替卡因 - 利多卡因混合物)。注射后20分钟(压迫眼球的间隔期)测量,RETRO后留下的最小眼球运动(凯斯滕鲍姆角膜缘试验)。给予PERI后 - 即使剂量为10毫升 - 残余眼球运动范围始终较高,即与RETRO相比,眼球运动麻痹的可靠性较低。所有麻醉方法后睑裂闭合力量(施特劳布技术)平均为零;然而,PERI后观察到的范围最小(可靠性最高)。几乎所有病例均发现完全角膜麻醉(德雷格麻醉计),即RETRO和PERI在感觉阻滞方面效果相当……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验