Werner S P, Shivapuja P K, Harris E F
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(1):13-20; discussion 21-2. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0013:SCITAA>2.0.CO;2.
Cast and cephalometric analyses were performed to measure the effects of treatment with a lip bumper. The lip bumper was fabricated from an 0.045 inch wire with shrink tubing and no acrylic shields. Nine of the 32 patients were evaluated two years after the comprehensive phase of treatment. Patients were in the mixed dentition stage of development (mean age of 9.9 yrs). A single orthodontist designed all the appliances and treated all the cases. There was significant expansion between the canines, first premolars, second premolars and molars, with the greatest expansion occurring between the first premolars. Cephalometric analysis revealed that the molars underwent angular uprighting but did not move bodily. Incisor irregularity decreased 60% during this phase of treatment. The retention cases revealed that the arch depth decreased, perhaps due to loss of leeway space, but arch widths all were broader, especially in the anterior segment, than at the end of the lip bumper phase. Incisor irregularity also remained trivial (x = 0.3 mm), suggesting appreciable stability.
进行了模型和头影测量分析,以评估唇挡治疗的效果。唇挡由一根0.045英寸的钢丝制成,带有收缩管且无丙烯酸护罩。32例患者中有9例在综合治疗阶段结束两年后接受了评估。患者处于混合牙列发育阶段(平均年龄9.9岁)。所有矫治器均由一位正畸医生设计,所有病例均由其治疗。犬牙、第一前磨牙、第二前磨牙和磨牙之间有明显的扩弓,最大扩弓发生在第一前磨牙之间。头影测量分析显示,磨牙发生了角度直立,但没有整体移动。在治疗的这个阶段,切牙不齐减少了60%。保持病例显示,牙弓深度减小,可能是由于可用间隙丧失,但牙弓宽度均比唇挡阶段结束时更宽,尤其是在前牙段。切牙不齐也仍然轻微(x = 0.3毫米),表明有相当的稳定性。