Steiner E, Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Staniszewski K, Franz P, Steurer M, Millesi W
Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik, Wien.
Rofo. 1994 May;160(5):397-405. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032449.
27 patients, clinically suspected of having parotid tumours, were examined prospectively by sonography (high frequency linear array) and MRI (1.5 T, T1- and T2-weighted SE sequences before, and T1-weighted SE sequences after contrast). In 23 patients, 25 intraglandular tumours were demonstrated (two were multicentric); they consisted of 6 malignant parotid tumours, 11 pleomorphic adenomas, 7 cystadenolymphomas and one oncocytic adenoma. 4 patients had extraglandular tumours. All tumours were demonstrated by either method, but two extraglandular tumours were incorrectly diagnosed by sonography as being intraglandular and 8 tumours (28%) were not completely delineated by sonography. MRI localised the tumours correctly in all cases and demonstrated all lesions accurately, independent of their position or size. In summary, sonography appears suitable as the primary imaging method in the investigation of parotid tumours but in case of large, parapharyngeal or malignant tumours, MRI is clearly superior to sonography.
对27例临床怀疑患有腮腺肿瘤的患者进行了前瞻性超声检查(高频线性阵列)和MRI检查(1.5T,对比前T1加权和T2加权SE序列,对比后T1加权SE序列)。23例患者发现25个腺内肿瘤(2个为多中心性);其中包括6例恶性腮腺肿瘤、11例多形性腺瘤、7例腺淋巴瘤和1例嗜酸性腺瘤。4例患者有腺外肿瘤。两种方法均能显示所有肿瘤,但超声检查将2例腺外肿瘤误诊为腺内肿瘤,8个肿瘤(28%)超声检查未能完全勾勒出轮廓。MRI在所有病例中均能正确定位肿瘤,并能准确显示所有病变,无论其位置或大小如何。总之,超声检查似乎适合作为腮腺肿瘤检查的首选成像方法,但对于大型、咽旁或恶性肿瘤,MRI明显优于超声检查。