O'Carroll R E, Curran S M, Ross M, Murray C, Riddle W, Moffoot A P, Ebmeier K P, Goodwin G M
MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Scotland.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1994 Feb;33(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01091.x.
The method of comparing premorbid versus current intellectual ability has become established clinical practice in the differential diagnosis of dementia versus depression. Recently, Schlosser & Ivison (1989) suggested that the comparison of premorbid ability versus current memory function may offer a more sensitive method of assessing early dementia. In the present study, a variety of within-subject discrepancy analyses comparing premorbid estimates with current measures of memory and intellectual functioning were compared across three groups: patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type, patients with major depression and healthy controls. The results revealed that, while mean group differences were easily demonstrated, the overlap between Alzheimer and depressed patients was large. It is concluded that none of the simple neuropsychological discrepancy analyses examined in the present study can be recommended for use in clinical practice for the differential diagnosis of dementia from major depression.
在痴呆与抑郁症的鉴别诊断中,比较病前与当前智力水平的方法已成为既定的临床实践。最近,施洛瑟和艾维森(1989年)提出,比较病前能力与当前记忆功能可能提供一种更敏感的早期痴呆评估方法。在本研究中,对三组人群进行了多种受试者内差异分析,比较病前估计值与当前记忆及智力功能测量值:阿尔茨海默型痴呆患者、重度抑郁症患者和健康对照组。结果显示,虽然很容易证明组间平均差异,但阿尔茨海默病患者和抑郁症患者之间的重叠很大。得出的结论是,本研究中所检验的任何一种简单神经心理学差异分析都不能推荐用于临床实践中痴呆与重度抑郁症的鉴别诊断。