Suppr超能文献

持续性室性心动过速的可诱导性与QRS时限之间的相关性。

Correlation between inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia and QRS duration.

作者信息

Brembilla-Perrot B

机构信息

Cardiologie A, CHU of Brabois, Vandoeuvre, France.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1994 Jan;15(1):26-31. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060375.

Abstract

Some studies provide a link between the width of QRS complexes and late potentials occurring at the end of the QRS complex in signal-averaged recordings. The purpose of this study was to compare three methods of QRS duration measurement: the conventional 12 lead ECG, the Frank vectorcardiogram (VCG) and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. The recordings were made at a similar time in 121 consecutive patients with the Cardionics PC-based system (ECG and VCG) and the Cardionics high resolution ECG, based on methods described by Simson. Patients with bundle branch block were excluded. All patients had presented a myocardial infarction and were studied either for spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias or systematically 3 to 6 weeks after an acute myocardial infarction. The signal-averaged ECG and VCG QRS durations were similar in 41 patients without inducible ventricular arrhythmias and with normal signal-averaged ECG but were longer (P < 0.001) than the conventional ECG QRS duration. In 36 patients with spontaneous and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the QRS duration was significantly longer on signal-averaged ECG than on VCG (P < 0.05) and longer on VCG than on conventional ECG (P < 0.05). The QRS duration was also significantly (P < 0.001) longer with the three techniques in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) than in patients without spontaneous and inducible VT. A QRS duration on VCG > or = 110 ms and on conventional ECG > or = 100 ms had a sensitivity of 93% and 77% and a specificity of 83% and 85% respectively for predicting an abnormal signal-averaged ECG. In conclusion, the measurement of QRS duration with the conventional ECG, VCG or the signal-averaged ECG could be a simple method to detect the patients with myocardial infarction prone to VT.

摘要

一些研究表明,在信号平均记录中,QRS波群宽度与QRS波群末端出现的晚电位之间存在联系。本研究的目的是比较三种测量QRS波群时限的方法:传统的12导联心电图、Frank向量心电图(VCG)和信号平均心电图。使用基于Cardionics PC系统(心电图和VCG)以及基于Simson描述方法的Cardionics高分辨率心电图,在121例连续患者的同一时间进行记录。排除束支传导阻滞患者。所有患者均有心肌梗死病史,要么因自发性室性心律失常接受研究,要么在急性心肌梗死后3至6周进行系统研究。在41例无诱发性室性心律失常且信号平均心电图正常的患者中,信号平均心电图和VCG的QRS波群时限相似,但长于传统心电图的QRS波群时限(P<0.001)。在36例有自发性和诱发性室性快速心律失常的患者中,信号平均心电图上的QRS波群时限显著长于VCG(P<0.05),VCG上的QRS波群时限长于传统心电图(P<0.05)。与无自发性和诱发性室性心动过速(VT)的患者相比,自发性室性心动过速患者使用这三种技术测量的QRS波群时限也显著更长(P<0.001)。VCG上的QRS波群时限≥110 ms且传统心电图上的QRS波群时限≥100 ms时,预测异常信号平均心电图的敏感性分别为93%和77%,特异性分别为83%和85%。总之,使用传统心电图、VCG或信号平均心电图测量QRS波群时限可能是检测易发生VT的心肌梗死患者的一种简单方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验