Cohen-Solal A, Aupetit J F, Dahan M, Baleynaud S, Slama M, Gourgon R
Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Eur Heart J. 1994 Jan;15(1):37-44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060377.
Although the haemodynamic response during submaximal supine exercise in mitral stenosis has been well described, the determinants of peak oxygen uptake during maximal upright exercise are poorly characterized and may differ in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. Seventy patients with isolated mitral stenosis underwent Doppler-echocardiography and bicycle exercise with respiratory gas analysis. Forty-two patients were in sinus rhythm (Group I) and 28 in atrial fibrillation (Group II). Peak oxygen uptake was 21.3 +/- 5.6 ml.min-1.kg-1 in group I and 18.1 +/- 5.1 ml.min-1.kg-1 in group II (P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between indices of exercise tolerance (exercise duration, ventilatory threshold, peak oxygen uptake, indexed peak oxygen uptake, peak oxygen pulse) and valve area or gradient in either group. Indexed peak oxygen uptake was not correlated to delta oxygen pulse but was linearly related (r = 0.43) to delta heart rate (delta heart rate = peak heart rate/rest heart rate) in Group I but not in Group II. Thus, in patients with mitral stenosis, no correlation was found between the mitral valve area or the gradient at rest and maximal upright exercise tolerance, suggesting that peripheral adaptation and, in sinus rhythm, chronotropic reserve, are important compensatory mechanisms.
虽然二尖瓣狭窄患者在次极量仰卧运动期间的血流动力学反应已有详尽描述,但最大直立运动期间峰值摄氧量的决定因素却鲜为人知,且在窦性心律和心房颤动患者中可能有所不同。70例孤立性二尖瓣狭窄患者接受了多普勒超声心动图检查和带呼吸气体分析的自行车运动试验。42例患者为窦性心律(I组),28例为心房颤动(II组)。I组的峰值摄氧量为21.3±5.6 ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹,II组为18.1±5.1 ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹(P<0.05)。两组中运动耐量指标(运动持续时间、通气阈值、峰值摄氧量、摄氧量指数、峰值氧脉搏)与瓣膜面积或压力阶差之间均无显著相关性。摄氧量指数与氧脉搏变化无关,但在I组中与心率变化(心率变化=运动峰值心率/静息心率)呈线性相关(r=0.43),而在II组中则无此相关性。因此,在二尖瓣狭窄患者中,静息时的二尖瓣面积或压力阶差与最大直立运动耐量之间未发现相关性,这表明外周适应性以及窦性心律时的变时性储备是重要的代偿机制。