McCrea W, Findley L J
Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Military Hospital, London.
Br J Clin Pract. 1994 Jan-Feb;48(1):22-4.
Four patients with recurrent transient loss of consciousness, all of whom had previously undergone extensive non-invasive cardiological investigations, were referred for neurological opinion. All were found to exhibit a resting bradycardia and a cardioinhibitory response to carotid sinus stimulation. All were referred for cardiological opinion but only two patients were considered by their respective cardiologists to warrant pacemaker implantation. Those who did not receive a pacemaker continue to suffer from their symptoms. The clinical management of these patients highlights an apparent divergence of opinion amongst cardiologists on the treatment of carotid sinus hypersensitivity and emphasises that, unless the ECG and blood pressure responses to carotid sinus stimulation are observed in patients with histories of unexplained episodes of altered consciousness, carotid sinus hypersensitivity will be missed as a possible cause of symptoms. The presence of unexplained bradycardia may suggest carotid sinus hypersensitivity.
4例反复出现短暂意识丧失的患者,均曾接受过广泛的非侵入性心脏检查,现被转诊以寻求神经科意见。所有患者均表现为静息性心动过缓以及对颈动脉窦刺激的心脏抑制反应。所有患者均被转诊以寻求心脏科意见,但各自的心脏科医生仅认为2例患者有必要植入起搏器。未接受起搏器治疗的患者症状依旧。这些患者的临床处理凸显了心脏科医生在颈动脉窦过敏症治疗方面明显的意见分歧,并强调,除非在有不明原因意识改变发作史的患者中观察到心电图和血压对颈动脉窦刺激的反应,否则可能会漏诊颈动脉窦过敏症这一症状的可能病因。不明原因心动过缓的存在可能提示颈动脉窦过敏症。