• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术的安全性如何?对一家私立医院中111例75岁及以上患者和2939例75岁以下患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术的分析。

How safe is coronary bypass surgery in the elderly patient? Analysis of 111 patients aged 75 years or more and 2939 patients younger than 75 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in a private hospital.

作者信息

Christenson J T, Schmuziger M, Maurice J, Simonet F, Velebit V

机构信息

Cardiovascular Unit, Hôpital de la Tour, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 1994 Feb;5(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199402000-00011.

DOI:10.1097/00019501-199402000-00011
PMID:8180747
Abstract

AIM AND METHODS

Data from patients younger than 75 years (group I, n = 2939) and patients aged 75 years or older (group II, n = 111) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during a 9-year period (January 1984 to April 1993) were analyzed to determine comparative risk factors for morbidity, early and late survival, and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Traditional risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking) were significantly more prevalent in group II. The number of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes 3 and 4 before surgery was also significantly higher in group II (P < 0.001), but emergency operations were equally distributed between the groups. Left main-stem stenosis was more frequent in group II patients (P < 0.01), while the number of vessels involved and pre-operative left ventricular function did not differ. Both groups underwent a mean of 4.5 grafts. Internal mammary grafts were placed in 48.4% (1422/2939) in group I and 19.8% (22/111) in group II (P < 0.001). The overall peri-operative mortality rate did not differ between the groups (2.9% for group I and 2.7% for group II). Non-fatal peri-operative myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, post-extracorporeal circulation disorientation, and temporary renal insufficiency were more prevalent in group II patients (all P < 0.05). Emergency operations and re-operative CABG increased the peri-operative mortality in both groups. The 3-year survival rate was 93% and the 3-year cardiac event-free rate was 88% for the group II patients. Most of the elderly patients (98%) were in NYHA functional classes 1 and 2 at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if elderly patients have a slightly higher postoperative morbidity than younger patients, and an increased mortality if operated upon in an emergency, long-term survival and freedom from cardiac events are excellent and justify the continued performance of CABG in patients aged 75 years of age or more.

摘要

目的与方法

分析1984年1月至1993年4月这9年间接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的75岁以下患者(I组,n = 2939)和75岁及以上患者(II组,n = 111)的数据,以确定发病、早期和晚期生存以及功能结局的比较危险因素。

结果

传统危险因素(高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病和吸烟)在II组中更为普遍。II组术前纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级为3级和4级的患者数量也显著更高(P < 0.001),但急诊手术在两组间分布均匀。II组患者左主干狭窄更为常见(P < 0.01),而受累血管数量和术前左心室功能无差异。两组平均进行了4.5次移植。I组48.4%(1422/2939)的患者使用了乳内动脉移植,II组为19.8%(22/111)(P < 0.001)。两组围手术期总死亡率无差异(I组为2.9%,II组为2.7%)。非致命性围手术期心肌梗死、室性心律失常、体外循环后定向障碍和暂时性肾功能不全在II组患者中更为普遍(均P < 0.05)。急诊手术和再次手术CABG增加了两组的围手术期死亡率。II组患者的3年生存率为93%,3年无心脏事件发生率为88%。大多数老年患者(98%)在随访结束时NYHA功能分级为1级和2级。

结论

即使老年患者术后发病率略高于年轻患者,且急诊手术时死亡率增加,但长期生存和无心脏事件情况良好,证明对75岁及以上患者继续进行CABG手术是合理的。

相似文献

1
How safe is coronary bypass surgery in the elderly patient? Analysis of 111 patients aged 75 years or more and 2939 patients younger than 75 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in a private hospital.老年患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术的安全性如何?对一家私立医院中111例75岁及以上患者和2939例75岁以下患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术的分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 1994 Feb;5(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199402000-00011.
2
Reoperative myocardial revascularization: an analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations.再次心肌血运重建:458例再次手术与2645例初次手术的分析
Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Oct;2(5):623-9.
3
Extensive endarterectomy of the left anterior descending coronary artery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting.左前降支冠状动脉广泛内膜切除术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Coron Artery Dis. 1995 Sep;6(9):731-7.
4
Determinants of operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Emphasis on the influence of internal mammary artery grafting on mortality and morbidity.老年患者冠状动脉旁路移植术手术死亡率的决定因素。重点关注乳内动脉移植对死亡率和发病率的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Jul;108(1):73-81.
5
Reoperative coronary artery bypass procedures: risk factors for early mortality and late survival.再次冠状动脉搭桥手术:早期死亡率和晚期生存率的危险因素
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Jan;11(1):129-33. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)01030-5.
6
Early and long term results of coronary artery bypass grafts in patients with dialysis dependent renal failure.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 May;15(5):691-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00097-4.
7
Does on-pump/beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting offer better outcome in end-stage coronary artery disease patients?对于终末期冠状动脉疾病患者,不停跳冠状动脉搭桥术能带来更好的治疗效果吗?
J Card Surg. 2000 Nov-Dec;15(6):403-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2000.tb01300.x.
8
The influence of age on the results of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting.年龄对再次冠状动脉搭桥手术结果的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 1997 Feb;8(2):91-6. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199702000-00004.
9
Risk factors for operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing internal mammary artery grafting.接受乳内动脉移植术的老年患者手术死亡率的危险因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Jun;57(6):1453-60; discussion 1460-1. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90100-7.
10
Long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly Japanese patients.日本老年患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Sep;60(3):576-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00461-S.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonanalgesic benefits of combined thoracic epidural analgesia with general anesthesia in high risk elderly off pump coronary artery bypass patients.高危老年非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥患者中胸段硬膜外镇痛联合全身麻醉的非镇痛益处。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):385-91. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.159810.