Suppr超能文献

异丙肾上腺素抑制心房重复激动的机制——与丙吡胺的比较。

Mechanism of the suppression of repetitive atrial firing by isoproterenol--comparison with disopyramide.

作者信息

Shimizu A, Fukatani M, Tanigawa M, Kaibara M, Konoe A, Isomoto S, Centurion O A, Yano K, Hashiba K

机构信息

Third Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 1994 Feb;43(2):175-83. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(94)90006-x.

Abstract

To investigate whether isoproterenol (Iso) could suppress the initiation of repetitive atrial firing (RAF), we investigated its effect on RAF in comparison with that of disopyramide (Diso). Extrastimuli at a basic cycle length of 500 ms were delivered from the high right atrium in 49 patients who received an intravenous infusion of Iso (0.01 microgram/kg per min) and in 39 patients given intravenous Diso (2 mg/kg per 10 min). Induction of RAF, the atrial effective refractory period (A-ERP), and the maximum conduction delay (MCD) were measured. Iso abolished the induction of RAF in 13/19 (68%) patients, while Diso did so in 13/22 (59%) patients. Thirty-four of the 41 patients with RAF in the baseline study had an A-ERP < 250 ms and an MCD > 40 ms. Iso significantly decreased the A-ERP from 205 +/- 26 to 194 +/- 23 ms (P < 0.01) and significantly decreased the MCD from 67 +/- 24 to 39 +/- 16 ms (P < 0.0001) in 19 patients with RAF. On the other hand, Diso significantly increased the A-ERP from 203 +/- 31 to 235 +/- 36 ms (P < 0.0001), and significantly diminished the MCD from 68 +/- 31 to 55 +/- 30 ms (P < 0.01) in 22 patients with RAF. In patients with new RAF (n = 7) or re-induced RAF (n = 14) during Iso or after Diso, the MCD was more than 40 ms. Our results suggest that there are two different modes of RAF suppression, i.e. shortening or lengthening of the A-ERP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为研究异丙肾上腺素(Iso)是否能抑制重复性房性心动过速(RAF)的起始,我们将其对RAF的作用与丙吡胺(Diso)进行了比较。在49例接受静脉输注Iso(0.01微克/千克每分钟)的患者和39例静脉给予Diso(2毫克/千克每10分钟)的患者中,从高位右心房以500毫秒的基础周期长度发放期外刺激。测量RAF的诱发情况、心房有效不应期(A-ERP)和最大传导延迟(MCD)。Iso使13/19(68%)的患者RAF诱发被消除,而Diso使13/22(59%)的患者RAF诱发被消除。在基线研究中41例有RAF的患者中,34例的A-ERP<250毫秒且MCD>40毫秒。Iso使19例有RAF的患者的A-ERP从205±26显著降至194±23毫秒(P<0.01),并使MCD从67±24显著降至39±16毫秒(P<0.0001)。另一方面,Diso使22例有RAF的患者的A-ERP从203±31显著增至235±36毫秒(P<0.0001),并使MCD从68±31显著减至55±30毫秒(P<0.01)。在Iso期间或Diso之后出现新的RAF(n = 7)或再诱发RAF(n = 14)的患者中,MCD超过40毫秒。我们的结果提示存在两种不同的RAF抑制模式,即A-ERP的缩短或延长。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验