Suppr超能文献

使用应力应变分析比较金属支架的机械变形特性。

Comparison of mechanical deformation properties of metallic stents with use of stress-strain analysis.

作者信息

Lossef S V, Lutz R J, Mundorf J, Barth K H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994 Mar-Apr;5(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(94)71499-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Elastic and plastic deformation properties of the Wallstent, Palmaz stent, and Strecker stent were evaluated quantitatively with an in vitro model simulating forces exerted by an eccentric lesion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A miniaturized compression testing device was constructed. Stress-strain graphs were obtained for each stent, and the elastic moduli and yield points were calculated.

RESULTS

There is a 21-fold range in the elastic modulus among the Wallstent, Palmaz stent, and Strecker stents. The Palmaz stent was the only device to exhibit permanent plastic deformation. The 10-mm Palmaz stent will undergo 15% focal eccentric narrowing at 0.75 atm of pressure; the "standard braid" and "less shortening braid" 10-mm Wallstents at 0.55 and 0.25 atm, respectively; and the 10-mm tantalum Strecker stent at 0.08 atm. Overlapping of stents doubles the stiffness of the Wallstent and the Strecker stent and doubles the yield point of the Palmaz stent. The 4-9 mm Palmaz stent is 30% more resistant to deformation than the larger 8-12-mm version when expanded to identical 8-mm diameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The "standard braid" version of the 10-mm Wallstent provides 2.3-fold additional strength for resistant stenoses compared with the "less shortening braid." Overlapping or nesting of stents may permit full expansion should there be incomplete expansion or recoil of a single stent. The 4-9-mm Palmaz stent is preferable from the standpoint of allowing the use of a smaller (7-F instead of 9-F) introducer sheath and also for providing superior resistance to deformation. A purely elastic stent such as the Wallstent is preferable in locations where permanent plastic deformation may occur, such as the thoracic outlet.

摘要

目的

使用模拟偏心病变施加力的体外模型,对Wallstent支架、Palmaz支架和Strecker支架的弹性和塑性变形特性进行定量评估。

材料与方法

构建了一个小型压缩测试装置。获取了每个支架的应力-应变图,并计算了弹性模量和屈服点。

结果

Wallstent支架、Palmaz支架和Strecker支架的弹性模量范围为21倍。Palmaz支架是唯一表现出永久性塑性变形的装置。10毫米的Palmaz支架在0.75个大气压下会发生15%的局灶性偏心狭窄;10毫米的“标准编织”和“较少缩短编织”Wallstent支架分别在0.55和0.25个大气压下出现这种情况;10毫米的钽制Strecker支架在0.08个大气压下出现这种情况。支架重叠会使Wallstent支架和Strecker支架的刚度加倍,使Palmaz支架的屈服点加倍。当扩展到相同的8毫米直径时,4-9毫米的Palmaz支架比8-12毫米的大尺寸版本抗变形能力强30%。

结论

与“较少缩短编织”的Wallstent支架相比,10毫米“标准编织”版本的Wallstent支架对耐药性狭窄提供了2.3倍的额外强度。如果单个支架出现不完全扩张或回缩,支架的重叠或嵌套可能允许完全扩张。从允许使用较小(7F而不是9F)的导入鞘以及提供更好的抗变形能力的角度来看,4-9毫米的Palmaz支架更可取。在可能发生永久性塑性变形的部位,如胸廓出口,像Wallstent这样的纯弹性支架更可取。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验