Koprowska I
Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Diagn Cytopathol. 1994;10(2):180-4. doi: 10.1002/dc.2840100219.
The fight for the acceptance of the validity of cytopathology has been fought by a group of individuals associated with George N. Papanicolaou. The common effort to convince the skeptics that Papanicolaou's method of diagnosing cancer was the best way to detect its presence at an early stage became a bond linking all of us. When we taught cytology, we felt more like preaching a gospel than like teaching a subject. Those of us who became involved in original research experienced an additional excitement from expanding the frontiers of our new specialty. This uniquely stimulating experience has been shared by women and men in most of the early cytology teaching centers throughout the world. This was different from the enthusiasm with which people enter the field of cytopathology today. All of us had to constantly prove the validity of what we were doing, whereas now the value of cytologic diagnosis is fully recognized and taken for granted.
为使细胞病理学的有效性得到认可而进行的斗争,是由一群与乔治·N·帕潘尼古拉乌相关的人展开的。共同努力说服怀疑者相信帕潘尼古拉乌的癌症诊断方法是早期检测癌症存在的最佳方式,这成为了将我们所有人联系在一起的纽带。当我们教授细胞学的时候,我们感觉更像是在宣扬一种福音,而不是在讲授一门学科。我们中那些参与原创研究的人,因拓展新专业领域的前沿而体验到了额外的兴奋。在全世界大多数早期细胞学教学中心,男性和女性都分享了这种独特的刺激体验。这与如今人们进入细胞病理学领域的热情有所不同。我们所有人都必须不断证明我们所做之事的有效性,而现在细胞学诊断的价值已得到充分认可且被视为理所当然。