Rossetti Y, Tadary B, Prablanc C
Vision et Motricité U 94 INSERM, Bron, France.
Exp Brain Res. 1994;97(3):487-96. doi: 10.1007/BF00241543.
Encoding of visual target location in extrapersonal space requires convergence of at least three types of information: retinal signals, information about orbital eye positions, and the position of the head on the body. Since the position of gaze is the sum of the head position and the eye position, inaccuracy of spatial localization of the target may result from the sum of the corresponding three levels of errors: retina, ocular and head. In order to evaluate the possible errors evoked at each level, accuracy of target encoding was assessed through a motor response requiring subjects to point with the hand towards a target seen under foveal vision, eliminating the retinal source of error. Subjects had first to orient their head to one of three positions to the right (0, 40, 80 degrees) and maintain this head position while orienting gaze and pointing to one of five target positions (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 degrees). This resulted in 11 combinations of static head and eye positions, and corresponded to five different gaze eccentricities. The accuracy of target pointing was tested without vision of the moving hand. Six subjects were tested. No systematic bias in finger pointing was observed for eye positions ranging from 0 to 40 degrees to the right or left within the orbit. However, the variability (as measured by a surface error) given by the scatter of hand pointing increased quadratically with eye eccentricity. A similar observation was made with the eye centered and the head position ranging from 0 to 80 degrees, although the surface error increased less steeply with eccentricity. Some interaction between eye and head eccentricity also contributed to the pointing error. These results suggest that pointing should be most accurate with a head displacement corresponding to 90% of the gaze eccentricity. These results explain the systematic hypometry of head orienting towards targets observed under natural conditions: thus the respective contribution of head and eye to gaze orientation might be determined in order to optimize accuracy of target encoding.
视网膜信号、有关眼眶眼位的信息以及头部在身体上的位置。由于注视位置是头部位置和眼位的总和,目标空间定位的不准确可能源于相应三个误差水平的总和:视网膜、眼球和头部。为了评估每个水平引发的可能误差,通过一项运动反应评估目标编码的准确性,该反应要求受试者用手指向在中央凹视觉下看到的目标,从而消除视网膜误差源。受试者首先要将头部转向右侧三个位置之一(0、40、80度),并在注视和指向五个目标位置之一(0、20、40、60、80度)时保持该头部位置。这产生了11种静态头部和眼位的组合,对应于五种不同的注视偏心率。在看不到移动手部的情况下测试目标指向的准确性。测试了六名受试者。在眼眶内左右眼位从0到40度范围内,未观察到手指指向的系统偏差。然而,手部指向散布所给出的变异性(以表面误差衡量)随眼偏心率呈二次方增加。当眼睛居中且头部位置从0到80度时也有类似观察结果,尽管表面误差随偏心率增加的幅度较小。眼和头偏心率之间的一些相互作用也导致了指向误差。这些结果表明,当头部位移对应于注视偏心率的90%时,指向应该最准确。这些结果解释了在自然条件下观察到的头部朝向目标的系统性低估:因此,可以确定头部和眼睛对注视方向的各自贡献,以优化目标编码的准确性。