McKean K J
Department of Psychology, Muskingum College, New Concord, OH 43762.
J Psychol. 1994 Mar;128(2):177-83. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712721.
Rather than examining the effect of the pessimistic explanatory style on an outcome variable reflecting a single domain, I studied the effects of multiple learned-helplessness risk factors on behavioral, cognitive, and affective variables. Undergraduate students completed the Learned Helplessness Scale (Quinless & McDermott-Nelson, 1988) as a measure of their expectation of uncontrollability and the Explanatory Style Questionnaire (Peterson et al., 1982) to determine their explanations for both positive and negative events. Results revealed a significant effect for risk level, with students at greater risk of helplessness reporting significantly more procrastination, lower grade point averages, and more dysphoria. These results support the use of multiple risk factors representing all learned-helplessness precursors and the assessment of learned-helplessness deficits drawn simultaneously from behavioral, cognitive, and affective domains.
我没有研究悲观解释风格对反映单一领域的结果变量的影响,而是研究了多种习得性无助风险因素对行为、认知和情感变量的影响。本科生完成了习得性无助量表(Quinless & McDermott-Nelson,1988),以衡量他们对不可控性的预期,并完成了解释风格问卷(Peterson等人,1982),以确定他们对积极和消极事件的解释。结果显示风险水平有显著影响,无助风险较高的学生报告的拖延行为明显更多、平均绩点更低、烦躁情绪更多。这些结果支持使用代表所有习得性无助先兆的多种风险因素,以及同时从行为、认知和情感领域对习得性无助缺陷进行评估。