• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甜味剂在水和单宁酸溶液中的适应性。

Adaptation of sweeteners in water and in tannic acid solutions.

作者信息

Schiffman S S, Pecore S D, Booth B J, Losee M L, Carr B T, Sattely-Miller E, Graham B G, Warwick Z S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1994 Mar;55(3):547-59. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90116-3.

DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(94)90116-3
PMID:8190776
Abstract

Repeated exposure to a tastant often leads to a decrease in magnitude of the perceived intensity; this phenomenon is termed adaptation. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of adaptation of the sweet response for a variety of sweeteners in water and in the presence of two levels of tannic acid. Sweetness intensity ratings were given by a trained panel for 14 sweeteners: three sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose), two polyhydric alcohols (mannitol, sorbitol), two terpenoid glycosides (rebaudioside-A, stevioside), two dipeptide derivatives (alitame, aspartame), one sulfamate (sodium cyclamate), one protein (thaumatin), two N-sulfonyl amides (acesulfame-K, sodium saccharin), and one dihydrochalcone (neohesperidin dihydrochalcone). Panelists were given four isointense concentrations of each sweetener by itself and in the presence of two concentrations of tannic acid. Each sweetener concentration was tasted and rated four consecutive times with a 30 s interval between each taste and a 2 min interval between each concentration. Within a taste session, a series of concentrations of a given sweetener was presented in ascending order of magnitude. Adaptation was calculated as the decrease in intensity from the first to the fourth sample. The greatest adaptation in water solutions was found for acesulfame-K, Na saccharin, rebaudioside-A, and stevioside. This was followed by the dipeptide sweeteners, alitame and aspartame. The least adaptation occurred with the sugars, polyhydric alcohols, and neohesperidin dihydrochalcone. Adaptation was greater in tannic acid solutions than in water for six sweeteners. Adaptation of sweet taste may result from the desensitization of sweetener receptors analogous to the homologous desensitization found in the beta adrenergic system.

摘要

反复接触一种味觉刺激物通常会导致所感知强度的大小降低;这种现象被称为适应。本研究的目的是确定在水中以及存在两种浓度单宁酸的情况下,多种甜味剂的甜味反应的适应程度。由一个经过训练的小组对14种甜味剂给出甜度强度评分:三种糖类(果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖)、两种多元醇(甘露醇、山梨醇)、两种萜类糖苷(甜菊糖苷A、甜菊糖苷)、两种二肽衍生物(阿力甜、阿斯巴甜)、一种氨基磺酸盐(环己基氨基磺酸钠)、一种蛋白质(奇异果甜蛋白)、两种N-磺酰基酰胺(乙酰磺胺酸钾、糖精钠)以及一种二氢查耳酮(新橙皮苷二氢查耳酮)。小组成员分别品尝每种甜味剂的四个等强度浓度,以及在存在两种浓度单宁酸的情况下的甜味剂。每种甜味剂浓度连续品尝并评分四次,每次品尝间隔30秒,每种浓度间隔2分钟。在一次味觉测试中,给定甜味剂的一系列浓度按大小升序呈现。适应程度通过从第一个样品到第四个样品强度的降低来计算。在水溶液中,乙酰磺胺酸钾、糖精钠、甜菊糖苷A和甜菊糖苷的适应程度最大。其次是二肽甜味剂阿力甜和阿斯巴甜。糖类、多元醇和新橙皮苷二氢查耳酮的适应程度最小。对于六种甜味剂,单宁酸溶液中的适应程度大于水中的适应程度。甜味的适应可能是由于甜味剂受体的脱敏,类似于在β肾上腺素能系统中发现的同源脱敏。

相似文献

1
Adaptation of sweeteners in water and in tannic acid solutions.甜味剂在水和单宁酸溶液中的适应性。
Physiol Behav. 1994 Mar;55(3):547-59. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90116-3.
2
Selective inhibition of sweetness by the sodium salt of +/-2-(4-methoxyphenoxy)propanoic acid.±2-(4-甲氧基苯氧基)丙酸的钠盐对甜味的选择性抑制作用。
Chem Senses. 1999 Aug;24(4):439-47. doi: 10.1093/chemse/24.4.439.
3
Investigation of synergism in binary mixtures of sweeteners.甜味剂二元混合物中的协同作用研究。
Brain Res Bull. 1995;38(2):105-20. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)00062-j.
4
Effect of temperature, pH, and ions on sweet taste.温度、pH值和离子对甜味的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2000 Feb;68(4):469-81. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00205-x.
5
Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.甜味剂的苦味与浓度的关系。
Brain Res Bull. 1995;36(5):505-13. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)00225-p.
6
Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception.口服硫酸锌溶液会抑制甜味感知。
Chem Senses. 2004 Jul;29(6):513-21. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh053.
7
Qualitative differences among sweeteners.甜味剂之间的质的差异。
Physiol Behav. 1979 Jul;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90113-6.
8
Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).使用时间性全选(TCATA)评估 16 种甜味剂的时间甜味和副味特征。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jul;121:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.C57BL/6ByJ和129P3/J小鼠对甜味剂的偏好
Chem Senses. 2001 Sep;26(7):905-13. doi: 10.1093/chemse/26.7.905.
10
A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.16 种甜味剂的心理物理剂量反应行为比较。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1632. doi: 10.3390/nu10111632.

引用本文的文献

1
Gradual increases in sugar concentration enhance total perceived sweetness in individuals prone to sweetness habituation.糖浓度的逐渐增加会增强易出现甜味习惯化的个体的总体甜味感知。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 15;16:1561107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561107. eCollection 2025.
2
Why Taste Is Pharmacology.为什么味觉是药理学。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;275:1-31. doi: 10.1007/164_2022_589.
3
Multi-Sip Time⁻Intensity Evaluation of Retronasal Aroma after Swallowing Oolong Tea Beverage.吞咽乌龙茶饮料后鼻后香气的多次啜饮时间⁻强度评估
Foods. 2018 Oct 25;7(11):177. doi: 10.3390/foods7110177.
4
Stimulus-Dependent Effects of Temperature on Bitter Taste in Humans.温度对人类苦味味觉的刺激依赖性影响。
Chem Senses. 2017 Feb;42(2):153-160. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw115. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
5
Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners may impact body weight and metabolism.非营养性甜味剂可能影响体重和新陈代谢的生理机制。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Dec 1;152(Pt B):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.036. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan.评估莫奈尔强制选择、配对比较跟踪程序,以确定整个生命周期的甜味偏好。
Chem Senses. 2011 May;36(4):345-55. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq134. Epub 2011 Jan 12.