Platt J F, Ellis J H, Rubin J M
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0030.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jun;162(6):1367-70. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.6.8192001.
Previous studies of transplant kidneys and recent reports on native kidneys have suggested intrarenal arterial Doppler findings can be helpful in the noninvasive workup of renal vein thrombosis. We used arterial Doppler sonography to evaluate cases of possible acute renal vein thrombosis in native kidneys that had equivocal results on standard Doppler analysis of the renal vein.
Twenty native kidneys in 12 patients with clinical findings suggestive of acute renal vein thrombosis had Doppler studies of the main renal vein that failed to show normal flow. In all 20 kidneys, duplex Doppler study of arcuate/interlobar intrarenal arteries was done and the resistive index was determined. The Doppler findings were compared with subsequent findings on either renal venograms (n = 11) or MR images (n = 9), which served as the reference "gold" standards.
The prevalence of renal vein thrombosis was 25% (5/20). Ten kidneys had very abnormal findings on arterial Doppler studies (absent or reversed end-diastolic flow), but only two of these were proved to have renal vein thrombosis. In six other kidneys, end-diastolic flow was identified but the resistive index was still elevated (> or = 0.70), and only one of these kidneys was proved to have renal vein thrombosis. Four kidneys had normal arterial Doppler studies, and 50% (two) of these were proved to have renal vein thrombosis. When absent or reversed end-diastolic flow was used as a sign of renal vein thrombosis, intrarenal arterial Doppler analysis had a sensitivity of 40% (2/5) and a specificity of 47% (7/15).
Unlike the reported experience in transplanted kidneys, intrarenal arterial Doppler analysis is neither sensitive nor specific for renal vein thrombosis in native kidneys. An intrarenal arterial Doppler study with normal findings should not prevent further workup if Doppler findings in the renal vein are equivocal, nor should absent or reversed end-diastolic arterial signals be considered highly suggestive of renal vein thrombosis.
既往关于移植肾的研究以及近期关于正常肾的报道表明,肾内动脉多普勒检查结果有助于肾静脉血栓形成的无创性检查。我们采用动脉多普勒超声检查来评估正常肾可能发生急性肾静脉血栓形成的病例,这些病例在肾静脉的标准多普勒分析中结果不明确。
12例临床症状提示急性肾静脉血栓形成的患者的20个正常肾接受了肾静脉的多普勒检查,结果未显示正常血流。对所有20个肾进行了弓形/叶间肾内动脉的双功多普勒检查并测定阻力指数。将多普勒检查结果与随后的肾静脉造影(n = 11)或磁共振成像(n = 9)结果进行比较,肾静脉造影和磁共振成像作为参考“金”标准。
肾静脉血栓形成的发生率为25%(5/20)。10个肾在动脉多普勒检查中有非常异常的表现(舒张末期血流缺失或反向),但其中只有2个被证实有肾静脉血栓形成。在另外6个肾中,识别出了舒张末期血流,但阻力指数仍然升高(≥0.70),其中只有1个肾被证实有肾静脉血栓形成。4个肾的动脉多普勒检查结果正常,其中50%(2个)被证实有肾静脉血栓形成。当以舒张末期血流缺失或反向作为肾静脉血栓形成的征象时,肾内动脉多普勒分析的敏感性为40%(2/5),特异性为47%(7/15)。
与移植肾的报道经验不同,肾内动脉多普勒分析对正常肾的肾静脉血栓形成既不敏感也无特异性。如果肾静脉的多普勒检查结果不明确,肾内动脉多普勒检查结果正常不应妨碍进一步检查,舒张末期动脉信号缺失或反向也不应被视为高度提示肾静脉血栓形成。