• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区生活与机构生活的成本效益分析。

A cost-benefit analysis of community versus institutional living.

作者信息

Murphy J G, Datel W E

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1976 Mar;27(3):165-70. doi: 10.1176/ps.27.3.165.

DOI:10.1176/ps.27.3.165
PMID:819346
Abstract

As part of a project to develop a model procedure for returning residents of institutions to the community, the Commonwealth of Virginia contracted with a consulting firm to develop a methodology for conducting a cost-benefit analysis of institutional versus community living. The methodology was used to project costs and benefits over a ten-year period for 52 clients successfully placed in the community through the project, called Service Integration for Deinstitutionalization (SID). The results showed an average net saving for each client of $20,800 over a ten-year period, mostly to the state government. The authors describe the methodology used in the analysis, the cost and benefit elements considered, and the adjustments made for economic factors that could not be measured directly.

摘要

作为一项为机构居民重返社区制定标准程序的项目的一部分,弗吉尼亚联邦政府与一家咨询公司签约,以制定一种方法来对机构生活与社区生活进行成本效益分析。该方法用于预测通过名为“去机构化服务整合”(SID)的项目成功安置到社区的52名客户在十年期间的成本和收益。结果显示,在十年期间,每位客户平均净节省20,800美元,大部分节省归州政府所有。作者描述了分析中使用的方法、考虑的成本和收益要素,以及对无法直接衡量的经济因素所做的调整。

相似文献

1
A cost-benefit analysis of community versus institutional living.社区生活与机构生活的成本效益分析。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1976 Mar;27(3):165-70. doi: 10.1176/ps.27.3.165.
2
Mental health reform fails.心理健康改革失败了。
Mod Healthc (Short Term Care). 1975 Dec;4(6):45-8.
3
One community's response to the multi-system service needs of individuals with mental illness and developmental disabilities.一个社区对患有精神疾病和发育障碍的个人的多系统服务需求的回应。
Community Ment Health J. 1993 Aug;29(4):347-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00761032.
4
The impact of closing a state psychiatric hospital on the county mental health system and its clients.关闭一家州立精神病院对县心理健康系统及其服务对象的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Oct;50(10):1297-302. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.10.1297.
5
Cost-benefit analysis for sheltered employment service programs for people with disabilities in Taiwan - a preliminary study.台湾地区庇护性就业服务计划之成本效益分析—初探研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(19):1672-6. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.656786. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
6
Benefit-cost analysis of supported competitive employment for persons with mental retardation.智力障碍者支持性竞争性就业的效益成本分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(1):71-89. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90041-2.
7
Learning disabilities. Community homes: institutions in waiting?学习障碍。社区之家:等待中的机构?
Nurs Stand. 1993;7(41):34-7. doi: 10.7748/ns.7.41.34.s39.
8
An ACT program for co-occurring disorders.
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Dec;50(12):1640. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.12.1640.
9
An economic analysis of the resettlement of people with mild learning disabilities and challenging behaviour.对轻度学习障碍及具有挑战性行为者重新安置的经济分析。
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):895-901. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00139-k.
10
Comparing costs of hospital and community care.比较医院护理和社区护理的成本。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1972 Jul;23(7):197-200. doi: 10.1176/ps.23.7.197.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health care costs: paucity of measurement.精神卫生保健成本:测量方法的匮乏。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;31(2):70-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00801902.
2
A special population. The elderly deinstitutionalized chronically mentally ill patient.
Psychiatr Q. 1983 Summer-Fall;55(2-3):90-105. doi: 10.1007/BF01064845.
3
Cost-benefit analysis of an emergency alarm and response system: a case study of a long-term care program.紧急警报与响应系统的成本效益分析:一项长期护理项目的案例研究
Health Serv Res. 1981 Spring;16(1):65-80.
4
Pennsylvania's domiciliary care experiment: II. Cost-benefit implications.宾夕法尼亚州的居家护理实验:II. 成本效益影响。
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):654-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.654.