Ornstein S, Bearden A
Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425.
J Fam Pract. 1994 Jun;38(6):606-10.
Despite emerging interest in computer-based patient records (CPRs), less than 1% of medical records in the United States are stored electronically. Some physicians may be reluctant to implement CPR systems because of fear that the physician-patient relationship would be adversely affected. This study ascertained the attitudes of patients regarding the use of CPR systems.
This study was an in-depth interview survey of 16 patients concerning the CPR system used at the family medicine department at the Medical University of South Carolina. Interview topics included patient knowledge, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and the impact of the CPR system on their relationship with their physician.
Most patients were informed about the nature of the CPR system and had positive attitudes toward it. Common perceptions were that CPR provides physicians with easy access to information, facilitates clinical encounters, and improves physician-patient relationship and the quality of care delivered. Although confidentiality was the major concern expressed about the CPR system, only one respondent indicated that this factor limited his interaction with his physician.
This study demonstrated patient acceptance and support for the CPR system in use at the study site. These findings should encourage physicians to use CPRs.
尽管人们对基于计算机的患者记录(CPR)的兴趣日益浓厚,但美国只有不到1%的医疗记录以电子方式存储。一些医生可能不愿实施CPR系统,因为担心医患关系会受到不利影响。本研究确定了患者对使用CPR系统的态度。
本研究是对南卡罗来纳医科大学家庭医学部使用的CPR系统对16名患者进行的深入访谈调查。访谈主题包括患者的了解情况、感知到的优缺点以及CPR系统对他们与医生关系的影响。
大多数患者了解CPR系统的性质并对其持积极态度。普遍的看法是,CPR为医生提供了便捷的信息获取途径,促进了临床诊疗,改善了医患关系以及所提供的护理质量。尽管保密性是对CPR系统表达的主要担忧,但只有一名受访者表示这一因素限制了他与医生的互动。
本研究表明患者对研究地点使用的CPR系统表示接受和支持。这些发现应鼓励医生使用CPR。