Elferink-Stinkens P M, Van Hemel O J, Brand R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Teaching Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994 Mar 15;53(3):165-73. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90115-5.
Within the framework of the project 'Obstetric Peer Review' (Verloskundige Onderlinge Kwaliteitsspiegeling, VOKS) differences between Dutch hospitals concerning various obstetrical interventions were investigated. Using data of the Perinatal Database of the Netherlands from hospitals with at least 2000 newborns in the 5-year period 1987-1991, remarkable differences in frequencies of labour induction, caesarean section and vaginal operative deliveries can be shown, even when these interventions were considered within homogeneous subgroups with respect to pregnancy- or delivery-related complications. The incidence of caesarean section (and labour induction and vaginal operative delivery) appeared to depend more on the specific hospital policy than might be explained by populations differences alone. These intervention differences between hospitals clearly demonstrated the need to carry out a multivariate analysis to compare hospitals in a relevant and unbiased way, while adjusting for these population differences. This will estimate the intervention risks in a way which allows a fair comparison of hospital intervention policies.
在“产科同行评审”(荷兰语:Verloskundige Onderlinge Kwaliteitsspiegeling,简称VOKS)项目框架内,对荷兰各医院在各种产科干预措施方面的差异进行了调查。利用荷兰围产期数据库中1987 - 1991年期间至少有2000例新生儿出生的医院的数据,即使在按妊娠或分娩相关并发症划分的同质亚组中考虑这些干预措施,也能显示出引产、剖宫产和阴道助产分娩频率存在显著差异。剖宫产(以及引产和阴道助产分娩)的发生率似乎更多地取决于特定医院的政策,而不仅仅是人群差异所能解释的。医院之间的这些干预差异清楚地表明,有必要进行多变量分析,以便在调整这些人群差异的同时,以相关且无偏的方式比较各医院。这将以一种能够公平比较医院干预政策的方式来估计干预风险。