Douglas S, Briones J, Chronister C
Case Western Reserve University, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1994 Spring;26(1):35-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x.
The study described the incidence of reporting consent rates (CRs) in nursing research articles, ascertained the mean CR for nursing research articles, ascertained differences between those studies that reported a CR and those that did not report a CR, and compared studies that used clinical populations to studies that used nonclinical populations. Research articles (371) from three nursing research journals were examined. Results showed that: (a) 40.7 percent of articles reported a CR, (b) the mean CR was 71.8 percent, (c) 41.1 percent reported inadequate CRs, (d) studies reporting a CR differed from those that did not on five of nine variables, and (e) studies employing clinical populations reported higher consent rates than did studies that employed nonclinical populations.
该研究描述了护理研究文章中报告同意率（CRs）的发生率，确定了护理研究文章的平均同意率，确定了报告同意率的研究与未报告同意率的研究之间的差异，并比较了使用临床人群的研究与使用非临床人群的研究。对来自三种护理研究期刊的371篇研究文章进行了审查。结果表明：（a）40.7%的文章报告了同意率，（b）平均同意率为71.8%，（c）41.1%的文章报告同意率不足，（d）报告同意率的研究与未报告同意率的研究在九个变量中的五个变量上存在差异，（e）采用临床人群的研究报告的同意率高于采用非临床人群的研究。
