• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fifteen things you should know about new Maryland laws when making health care decisions.

作者信息

Kennedy C P

出版信息

Md Med J. 1994 Mar;43(3):253-6.

PMID:8201853
Abstract

Recent dramatic changes to Maryland law regarding health care decision making for incapacitated patients will have significant impact on the role of physicians in making these decisions. On October 1, 1993, the newly passed Maryland Health Care Decision Act took effect, and revisions to state guardianship laws were implemented. The laws, which Governor Schaefer approved on May 11, 1993, modify existing statutory language pertaining to the four legal tools available for making health care decisions for a person when he or she becomes incapacitated: (1) living wills, (2) substituted consents for medical procedures, (3) health care power of attorney appointments, and (4) guardianship proceedings. This article summarizes 15 important points in these new or revised Maryland laws on health care decision making.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fifteen things you should know about new Maryland laws when making health care decisions.
Md Med J. 1994 Mar;43(3):253-6.
2
Making health care decisions for others.为他人做出医疗保健决策。
Ethics Medics. 1997 Jun;22(6):1-3.
3
Maryland's 1993 Health Care Decisions Act--implications for health care practitioners.
MD Law Rev. 1994;53(4):1131-57.
4
Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.死亡权利——法院要求有明确且令人信服的证据证明处于持续性植物状态的患者有意终止维持生命的治疗;1993年《医疗保健决策法》使结果有了新的解读。
Univ Baltimore Law Rev. 1994 Spring;23(2):619-44.
5
The Maryland Health Care Decisions Act: achieving the right balance?《马里兰州医疗保健决策法案》:实现恰当的平衡?
MD Law Rev. 1994;53(4):1064-130.
6
Moral distress: a job hazard for respiratory therapists?道德困扰:呼吸治疗师的职业风险?
Mak Rounds Health Faith Ethics. 1995 Sep 11;1(1):4-7.
7
New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.新泽西州医疗保健预先指示法案。
N J Statut Annot N J. 1991 Jul 11;Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78:26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78.
8
Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.在治疗决策中,患者不应总是被置于首位。
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Spring;4(1):63-5.
9
Developing issues in medical decision making: the durable power of attorney and institutional ethics committees.医学决策中的新问题:持久授权书与机构伦理委员会
Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):315-26.
10
Advance directives and health care proxies: recent developments in the law.
Med Staff Couns. 1992 Winter;6(1):49-59.