Tommasini N R
Yale University School of Nursing, Yale-New Haven Hospital, CT 06536-0740.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1994 Feb;8(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(94)90015-9.
Private insurance coverage has historically been and continues to be discriminatory toward patients requiring treatment for mental illness and substance abuse disorders in comparison with those in need of general medical care. Factors contributing to this disparity include stigma, relatively low overt consumer demand for psychiatric care, lack of knowledge about psychiatric illness and treatment on the part of insurers, a historical reliance on public sector psychiatry, and the assumption that more liberal psychiatric benefits result in unnecessary and excessive use. Strategies aimed at eliminating discriminatory insurance practices against those in need of mental health care must be implemented. Recommended approaches include further research on the cost effectiveness of mental health care, public education regarding the nature of mental illness and its treatment, patient/family advocacy, and the marketing of services by mental health professionals.
与需要一般医疗护理的患者相比,私人保险覆盖范围在历史上一直且仍在对需要治疗精神疾病和药物滥用障碍的患者存在歧视。造成这种差距的因素包括污名化、消费者对精神科护理的公开需求相对较低、保险公司对精神疾病和治疗缺乏了解、历史上对公共部门精神病学的依赖,以及认为更宽松的精神科福利会导致不必要和过度使用的假设。必须实施旨在消除针对需要心理健康护理者的歧视性保险做法的策略。推荐的方法包括进一步研究精神卫生保健的成本效益、开展关于精神疾病性质及其治疗的公众教育、患者/家庭倡导,以及精神卫生专业人员进行服务营销。