Suppr超能文献

Aspects of central venous access catheter usage in patients with malignancy.

作者信息

Hardman D, Englund R, Hanel K

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, St George's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1994 Jun 8;107(979):224-6.

PMID:8208484
Abstract

AIMS

A review of 5 years' experience with central venous access catheters (CVAC) to examine the results of catheter placement technique (open or percutaneous) on subsequent CVAC performance. In addition the catheter function and utilisation of both Hickman type and Access Port type of CVAC were reviewed to assess the indications and the types of access devices chosen in selected patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of CVAC between 1987 and 1991 was undertaken. During this time 113 CVAC were placed by the open (n = 76) or percutaneous (n = 37) method. The type of catheter used was Hickman (n = 79) or Access Port (n = 34). Indications for CVAC placement were haematological malignancy 74.2%, other malignancy 14.1%, and the rest were accounted for by TPN, HIV infection, osteomyelitis, anaemia and haemochromatosis.

RESULTS

There was no difference between duration of function for CVAC placed by the open (5.1 months 95% CI, 3.8-6.4) and percutaneous methods (3 months, 95% CI 2.2-3.8). Nor was there a difference in duration of function between Hickmans (4.47 months, 95% CI 3.3-5.6) and Access Ports (4.3 months, 95% CI 2.8-5.8). CVAC morbidity included sepsis, accidental displacement, major venous thrombosis, bleeding and port erosion. There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of complications between the open (25%) versus percutaneous (22%) techniques. The clinically significant difference in morbidity related to the type of catheter used: Hickman (18%) versus Access Port (35%). Infection and sepsis were a problem in the Port group accounting for 20.6% of the complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe CVAC account for significant morbidity which is not often taken into account by those recommending their use, particularly in the management of malignant disease. In addition CVAC placement should be part of a service in consultation. There are cost-benefit advantages in using orthodox central lines in the sick patient with a view to placing a CVAC at a later date.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验