• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧乳房重建:传统与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣对比

Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free TRAM.

作者信息

Baldwin B J, Schusterman M A, Miller M J, Kroll S S, Wang B G

机构信息

Department of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Jun;93(7):1410-6; discussion 1417.

PMID:8208807
Abstract

Free TRAM flap transfer is now routinely offered to patients requiring breast reconstruction. This study compares results of conventional superior-pedicled TRAM flaps and free TRAM flaps in bilateral breast reconstructions. A total of 92 breasts were reconstructed in 46 patients. Eighteen patients had free TRAM flap reconstructions, and 28 patients were reconstructed with conventional TRAM flaps. Comparison of average operative blood loss and average operative time for the two techniques showed blood loss of 575 cc and an operative time of 9.6 hours for the free TRAM reconstructions and a blood loss of 313 cc and an operative time of 6.6 hours for the conventional TRAM reconstructions. For free TRAM flap reconstructions, both blood loss and operative time decreased significantly between the first and second group of nine patients: from 819 to 360 cc of blood loss and from 10.5 to 8.9 hours of operative time. Partial flap loss (skin and fat necrosis) and fat necrosis only occurred in 13 and 7 percent, respectively, of conventional TRAM flaps, but neither occurred in free TRAM flaps. However, early in the series, three free flaps were lost in two patients, requiring implant placement. Bilateral breast reconstruction using the free TRAM flap may offer a lower complication rate than the conventional TRAM flap by virtue of improved blood supply and less abdominal wall disruption. Surgeons, however, are forewarned that this procedure has a steep learning curve, and surgeons lacking microsurgical expertise may be better served by the conventional TRAM flap.

摘要

对于需要进行乳房重建的患者,目前常规采用游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣转移术。本研究比较了传统上蒂横腹直肌肌皮瓣和游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣在双侧乳房重建中的效果。46例患者共重建了92个乳房。18例患者采用游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣重建,28例患者采用传统横腹直肌肌皮瓣重建。两种技术的平均术中失血量和平均手术时间比较显示,游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣重建的失血量为575毫升,手术时间为9.6小时;传统横腹直肌肌皮瓣重建的失血量为313毫升,手术时间为6.6小时。对于游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣重建,在第一组和第二组各9例患者中,失血量和手术时间均显著减少:失血量从819毫升降至36毫升,手术时间从10.5小时降至8.9小时。部分皮瓣丢失(皮肤和脂肪坏死)和单纯脂肪坏死分别仅发生在13%和7%的传统横腹直肌肌皮瓣中,而游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣均未出现。然而,在该系列研究早期,2例患者的3个游离皮瓣坏死,需要植入假体。由于血供改善和腹壁破坏较少,使用游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣进行双侧乳房重建可能比传统横腹直肌肌皮瓣的并发症发生率更低。不过,需要预先提醒外科医生,该手术有一个陡峭的学习曲线,缺乏显微外科专业知识的外科医生可能采用传统横腹直肌肌皮瓣会更好。

相似文献

1
Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free TRAM.双侧乳房重建:传统与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣对比
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Jun;93(7):1410-6; discussion 1417.
2
Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Aug;90(2):255-61; discussion 262.
3
Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.肥胖患者中游离和带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建的效果比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Dec;108(7):1954-60; discussion 1961-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00017.
4
DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和带蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣:结局比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 May;117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000210679.77449.7d.
5
Immediate, bilateral transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after mastectomy.乳房切除术后即刻双侧腹直肌肌皮瓣重建术。
Am Surg. 1993 Aug;59(8):519-22; discussion 522-4.
6
[Breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flap (a retrospective study of 115 consecutive cases)].带蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房再造术(115例连续病例回顾性研究)
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2008 Aug;53(4):309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
7
Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.游离腹直肌肌皮瓣与带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣:成本比较与结果分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Nov;100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199711000-00006.
8
[Pedicled versus free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction].[带蒂与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣用于乳房重建]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999 Mar;31(2):126-33. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-13508.
9
Late results of breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps: a prospective multicentric study.游离腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建的远期结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jun;95(7):1195-204; discussion 1205-6.
10
TRAM flap for immediate post mastectomy reconstruction: comparison between pedicled and free transfer.乳房切除术后即刻乳房重建的横行腹直肌肌皮瓣:带蒂转移与游离转移的比较
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005 Dec;17(4):231-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Partial Removal of Rectus Abdominis Muscle Inserting into Ribs in Ipsilateral Pedicled TRAM Flap for Breast Reconstruction.同侧带蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术中部分切除止于肋骨的腹直肌肌头
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 9;11(22):6647. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226647.
2
Bilateral Simultaneous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP- and TMG Flaps: Head to Head Comparison, Risk and Complication Analysis.双侧同时行腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和横向股薄肌肌皮瓣乳房重建:直接比较、风险与并发症分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 28;9(7):2031. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072031.
3
Breast reconstruction at the MD Anderson Cancer Center.
MD安德森癌症中心的乳房重建术。
Gland Surg. 2016 Aug;5(4):416-21. doi: 10.21037/gs.2016.05.03.
4
Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.乳房切除术后自体组织乳房重建。
Hippokratia. 2006 Oct;10(4):153-62.
5
New technical approach for the repair of an abdominal wall defect after a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: a case report.腹直肌肌皮瓣修复术后腹壁缺损的新技术方法:一例病例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2008 Apr 16;2:108. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-108.
6
[The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. A "second defensive line" in microvascular reconstructions of defects in the head and neck area].
HNO. 2006 Jan;54(1):20-4. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1286-2.