Chorro F J, Guerrerro J, Bataller M, Sanchís J, Burguera M, Calpe J, Espí J, López-Merino V
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia.
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1994 Apr;47(4):209-20.
A study is made of the influence of methodology on the analysis of cardiac cycle variability in terms of frequency and time domains.
Twenty-five individuals were divided into three groups: 1) non-smokers (n = 10); 2) smokers (n = 8); and 3) non-smokers without guided respiratory frequency (n = 7). An analysis was made of RR variability during 5 min intervals in time domain (standard deviation, variation coefficient, and difference between maximum and minimum RR), and frequency domain (spectral analysis, Fast Fourier Transform algorithm using 5 types of data windows).
On comparing the results obtained in the 25 individuals with the 5 data windows, significant differences were observed (ANOVA; p < 0.001) in maximum and total amplitudes of the spectrum (in absolute terms) in the low frequency band (0.04-0.15 Hz). No significant differences were found between the normalized values or between the low/high (0.15-0.40 Hz) frequency ratio: W1 = 1.63 +/- 0.30; W2 = 1.62 +/- 0.29; W3 = 1.65 +/- 0.31; W4 = 1.52 +/- 0.26, and W5 = 1.55 +/- 0.27 (X +/- SE). On averaging the RR intervals each 5 cycles, significant differences were encountered for great part of the parameters studied. No significant differences were encountered for great part of the parameters studied. No significant differences were noted between the non-smokers as regards the use or non-use of a metronome (low/high frequency ratio in group 1 = 1.85 +/- 0.39 vs group 3 = 1.78 +/- 0.43; NS). The linear regressions between the variability parameters in terms of time and frequency domains (absolute values), and age (group 1) were significant, with greater regression coefficients on using the linear transformation of an exponential model. On comparing groups 1 and 2, a non statistically significant trend towards smaller maximum and total amplitudes (absolute values) was noted in group 2 for both frequency bands.
研究方法学对心动周期变异性在频域和时域分析方面的影响。
25名个体被分为三组:1)非吸烟者(n = 10);2)吸烟者(n = 8);3)无呼吸频率引导的非吸烟者(n = 7)。对时域中5分钟间隔内的RR变异性(标准差、变异系数以及最大和最小RR之间的差值)和频域(频谱分析、使用5种数据窗的快速傅里叶变换算法)进行分析。
将25名个体使用5种数据窗得到的结果进行比较时,在低频带(0.04 - 0.15Hz)频谱的最大和总振幅(绝对值)方面观察到显著差异(方差分析;p < 0.001)。归一化值之间或低/高(0.15 - 0.40Hz)频率比之间未发现显著差异:W1 = 1.63 ± 0.30;W2 = 1.62 ± 0.29;W3 = 1.65 ± 0.31;W4 = 1.52 ± 0.26,以及W5 = 1.55 ± 0.27(X ± SE)。每5个心动周期对RR间期进行平均时,所研究的大部分参数存在显著差异。所研究的大部分参数未发现显著差异。在非吸烟者中,节拍器的使用与否未发现显著差异(第1组的低/高频比 = 1.85 ± 0.39,第3组 = 1.78 ± 0.43;无显著性差异)。时域和频域(绝对值)变异性参数与年龄(第1组)之间的线性回归显著,使用指数模型的线性变换时回归系数更大。比较第1组和第2组时,第2组在两个频带的最大和总振幅(绝对值)均有非统计学显著的变小趋势。
1)数据窗类型(傅里叶分析)对某些绝对值表示的参数引入显著改变,但归一化值之间无此情况;2)信号平均极大地改变了所获得的信息;3)随年龄观察到的变异性参数降低更符合指数模型;4)呼吸频率引导与否未检测到差异;5)吸烟似乎导致心动周期变异性降低的趋势。