• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

试验间食物呈现对大鼠预期目标追踪的影响。

The effect of intertrial food presentations on anticipatory goal-tracking in the rat.

作者信息

Durlach P J, Shane D O

机构信息

McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol B. 1993 Aug;46(3):289-318. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401090.

DOI:10.1080/14640749308401090
PMID:8210453
Abstract

Four experiments examined the sensitivity of anticipatory goal-tracking in the rat to stimulus-food contingency. Contingency was manipulated by varying the probability of food delivery in the absence of a food-tray-light or clicker conditional stimulus (CS), while holding constant the probability of food coincident with the CS. CS control of anticipatory food tray investigation was examined after a period of context extinction in all experiments. Acquisition of stimulus control was undermined by the scheduling of intertrial food deliveries (Experiment 1). The rate of intertrial food deliveries influenced subsequent acquisition of CS control when all intertrial food deliveries were omitted (Experiment 2). When intertrial food deliveries were added to the training regimen subsequent to acquisition of CS control, that control was impaired (Experiments 3 and 4).

摘要

四项实验研究了大鼠预期目标追踪对刺激-食物关联性的敏感性。通过改变在无食物托盘灯或点击器条件刺激(CS)时食物递送的概率来操纵关联性,同时保持与CS同时出现的食物概率不变。在所有实验中,经过一段时间的情境消退后,检测了CS对预期食物托盘探究的控制。实验性食物递送的安排破坏了刺激控制的习得(实验1)。当所有实验性食物递送都被省略时,实验性食物递送的速率影响了随后CS控制的习得(实验2)。当在习得CS控制后将实验性食物递送添加到训练方案中时,这种控制受到了损害(实验3和4)。

相似文献

1
The effect of intertrial food presentations on anticipatory goal-tracking in the rat.试验间食物呈现对大鼠预期目标追踪的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1993 Aug;46(3):289-318. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401090.
2
Intertrial unconditioned stimuli preferentially interfere with delay conditioning.试验间非条件刺激优先干扰延迟条件作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):232-42. doi: 10.1037/a0016922.
3
Intertrial intervals and contextual conditioning in appetitive pavlovian learning: effects over the ABA renewal paradigm.奖赏性巴甫洛夫学习中的试验间期与情境性条件作用:对ABA恢复范式的影响
Behav Processes. 2014 Sep;107:47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
Effects of an ethanol-paired CS on responding for ethanol and food: Comparisons with a stimulus in a Truly-Random-Control group and to a food-paired CS on responding for food.与乙醇配对的条件刺激对乙醇和食物反应的影响:与真随机对照组中的刺激以及与食物配对的条件刺激对食物反应的比较。
Alcohol. 2016 Dec;57:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.通过标记训练试验预防退化性应急效应。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2000 May;53(2):97-119. doi: 10.1080/713932719.
6
The role of different subregions of the basolateral amygdala in cue-induced reinstatement and extinction of food-seeking behavior.基底外侧杏仁核不同亚区在线索诱导的食物寻求行为恢复及消退中的作用。
Neuroscience. 2007 Jun 8;146(4):1484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.025. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
7
Context effects on choice.情境对选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):301-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-301.
8
Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning.情境条件作用和无条件刺激呈现对食欲性条件作用中表现的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1993 Feb;46(1):63-95.
9
Stimulus preexposure speeds or slows subsequent acquisition of associative learning depending on learning test procedures and response measure.刺激预暴露会加快或减慢随后联想学习的习得,这取决于学习测试程序和反应测量方式。
Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):134-156. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0297-7.
10
Amphetamine decreases the expression and acquisition of appetitive conditioning but increases the acquisition of anticipatory responding over a trace interval.苯丙胺会降低食欲性条件反射的表达和习得,但会增加在痕迹间隔期间预期反应的习得。
J Psychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;18(4):516-26. doi: 10.1177/0269881104047279.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesostriatal dopamine is sensitive to changes in specific cue-reward contingencies.中脑边缘多巴胺对特定线索-奖励关联的变化敏感。
Sci Adv. 2024 May 31;10(22):eadn4203. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn4203. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Associative and temporal processes: a dual process approach.联想与时间进程:一种双进程方法。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
3
On the motivational properties of reward cues: Individual differences.奖励线索的动机属性:个体差异。
Neuropharmacology. 2014 Jan;76 Pt B(0 0):450-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.040. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
4
The on-baseline latent inhibition effect is not counterconditioning.基线期潜在抑制效应并非对抗条件作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Mar;118(1):104-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02245256.