Suppr超能文献

纵向间隔计数数据分析方法的比较

Comparison of methods for the analysis of longitudinal interval count data.

作者信息

Stukel T A

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Medicine (Biostatistics), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755-3861.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1993 Jul 30;12(14):1339-51. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121406.

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are often concerned with estimating the recurrence rate of a non-fatal event. In many cases, only the total number of events occurring during successive time intervals is known. We compared a mixed Poisson-gamma regression method proposed by Thall and a quasi-likelihood method proposed by Zeger and Liang for the analysis of such data, in the case where the mean was correctly specified, using simulation techniques with large samples. Both methods produced similar standard errors in most situations, except in the case of time-dependent covariates with non-Poisson-gamma data where they were seriously underestimated by the Thall method. A simple method for discriminating between the variance forms of the two methods is described. The findings are applied to the analyses of clinical trials of non-melanoma skin cancer and familial polyposis. This study extends the findings of Breslow concerning variance misspecification in overdispersed Poisson and quasi-likelihood models to the longitudinal setting.

摘要

纵向研究通常关注于估计非致命事件的复发率。在许多情况下,仅知道在连续时间间隔内发生的事件总数。我们比较了Thall提出的混合泊松-伽马回归方法和Zeger与Liang提出的拟似然方法,用于分析此类数据,在均值被正确设定的情况下,使用大样本模拟技术。在大多数情况下,两种方法产生的标准误差相似,但在具有非泊松-伽马数据的时间相依协变量的情况下,Thall方法严重低估了标准误差。描述了一种区分两种方法方差形式的简单方法。这些发现应用于非黑色素瘤皮肤癌和家族性息肉病的临床试验分析。本研究将Breslow关于过度分散泊松模型和拟似然模型中方差误设的发现扩展到纵向研究背景。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验