Suppr超能文献

心理测量方法和非器质性体征测试在检测腰痛患者的疾病成因不明性障碍中的应用。

Use of psychometric measures and nonorganic signs testing in detecting nomogenic disorders in low back pain patients.

作者信息

Hayes B, Solyom C A, Wing P C, Berkowitz J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University Hospital Back Pain Clinic, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Aug;18(10):1254-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199308000-00002.

Abstract

The effect of financial compensation on responses to psychometric testing was studied in 231 chronic back pain patients. Item by item comparison of responses to two tests, readministered within 4 hours, yielded inconsistency scores. These inconsistency scores, along with scores on other psychometric measures and on Waddell's nonorganic signs test, of a group of 97 patients anticipating or receiving financial compensation (AFC), and a group of 134 patients not receiving or anticipating financial compensation (non-AFC) were compared. The AFC group had significantly higher mean scores than did the non-AFC group on the inconsistency measures, on almost all psychometric tests and on nonorganic signs. Almost all non-AFC subjects scored "0" on nonorganics, whereas 83% of AFC subjects scored "2" or higher. Prediction analysis revealed that the nonorganics score alone can predict AFC/non-AFC status; 90% of subjects were correctly classified. The inconsistency scores correctly classified 78%. Together, they correctly classified 93%. It was concluded that nonorganic scores and inconsistency scores (as defined by the investigators) distinguish between, and can predict membership in AFC and non-AFC groups. The significantly higher inconsistency scores obtained by the AFC group suggest that these psychometric test results are unreliable and hence invalid for this group.

摘要

在231名慢性背痛患者中研究了经济补偿对心理测试反应的影响。对在4小时内重新进行的两项测试的反应进行逐项比较,得出不一致分数。比较了一组97名预期或接受经济补偿(AFC)的患者和一组134名未接受或预期经济补偿(非AFC)的患者的这些不一致分数,以及其他心理测量指标和瓦德尔非器质性体征测试的分数。AFC组在不一致测量、几乎所有心理测试和非器质性体征方面的平均得分显著高于非AFC组。几乎所有非AFC受试者在非器质性体征上的得分都是“0”,而83%的AFC受试者得分“2”或更高。预测分析表明,仅非器质性体征得分就能预测AFC/非AFC状态;90%的受试者被正确分类。不一致分数正确分类率为78%。两者结合,正确分类率为93%。得出的结论是,非器质性体征分数和不一致分数(如研究者所定义)能够区分并可预测AFC组和非AFC组的成员身份。AFC组获得的显著更高的不一致分数表明,这些心理测试结果不可靠,并因此对该组无效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验