• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振血管造影和双功成像:用于选择有症状颈动脉内膜切除术候选者的无创检查。

Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates.

作者信息

Turnipseed W D, Kennell T W, Turski P A, Acher C W, Hoch J R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

出版信息

Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):643-8; discussion 648-9.

PMID:8211677
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This report describes our experience with the use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis and management of 70 patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Prospective evaluation of our first 30 patients showed that duplex imaging and MRA accurately correlated with conventional cerebral arteriograms (XRA) in patients with symptoms with greater than 70% ipsilateral carotid artery stenoses. In MRA versus XRA accuracy was 94%, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 93%. With duplex scanning versus XRA accuracy was 88%, sensitivity 93%, and specificity 93%.

METHODS

We are now performing carotid endarterectomy on patients with symptoms without preoperative XRA when there is exact correlation between duplex imaging and MRA. Patients must have focal hemispheric symptoms, ipsilateral duplex peak systolic velocity greater than 2 m/sec, and high-quality MRA imaging of the carotid vessels.

RESULTS

We have prospectively entered 40 patients for preoperative evaluation with duplex imaging and MRA. High-quality MRA and duplex studies were obtained in 35 patients (88%). XRA was required in the remaining five patients (12%) because of discrepancies between duplex scanning and MRA. Endarterectomy was performed without morbidity or death. Combined use of duplex scanning and MRA eliminated XRA in 35 cases and created a net savings of more than $125,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience suggests that preoperative XRA may not be necessary when duplex imaging and MRA confirm the presence of severe extracranial disease.

摘要

背景

本报告描述了我们使用双功超声成像和磁共振血管造影(MRA)诊断和治疗70例有症状颈动脉疾病患者的经验。对我们最初30例患者的前瞻性评估表明,对于同侧颈动脉狭窄超过70%且有症状的患者,双功超声成像和MRA与传统脑动脉造影(XRA)结果准确相关。在MRA与XRA的对比中,准确率为94%,敏感性为100%,特异性为93%。在双功扫描与XRA的对比中,准确率为88%,敏感性为93%,特异性为93%。

方法

当双功超声成像和MRA结果确切相关时,我们现在对有症状但未进行术前XRA的患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术。患者必须有局灶性半球症状、同侧双功超声收缩期峰值速度大于2米/秒,以及高质量的颈动脉MRA成像。

结果

我们前瞻性地纳入了40例患者进行术前双功超声成像和MRA评估。35例患者(88%)获得了高质量的MRA和双功超声检查结果。其余5例患者(12%)因双功扫描和MRA结果不一致而需要进行XRA检查。实施内膜切除术后无并发症或死亡发生。双功扫描和MRA联合使用在35例病例中无需进行XRA检查,净节省费用超过12.5万美元。

结论

我们的经验表明,当双功超声成像和MRA证实存在严重颅外疾病时,术前XRA可能并非必要。

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates.磁共振血管造影和双功成像:用于选择有症状颈动脉内膜切除术候选者的无创检查。
Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):643-8; discussion 648-9.
2
Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.在为颈动脉内膜切除术选择患者时,磁共振血管造影是双功超声扫描的一种准确的成像辅助手段。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Sep;32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.109330.
3
Blinded-reader comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis.磁共振血管造影与双功超声检查对颈动脉分叉狭窄的盲法阅片者比较
Stroke. 1994 Jan;25(1):4-10. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.1.4.
4
Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis.联合使用双功超声成像和磁共振血管造影术评估有症状的同侧重度颈动脉狭窄患者。
J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;17(5):832-9; discussion 839-40. doi: 10.1067/mva.1993.45110.
5
Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients--is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis.无症状患者的颈动脉内膜切除术——是否需要造影血管造影?发病率分析。
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Dec;22(6):706-14; discussion 714-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70061-7.
6
Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography.60%或更严重颈动脉狭窄的测定:磁共振血管造影和双功超声与传统血管造影的前瞻性比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 1998 May;12(3):236-43. doi: 10.1007/s100169900146.
7
Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?颈动脉分叉处的术前评估。磁共振血管造影和双功超声检查能否取代造影动脉造影?
Stroke. 1995 Oct;26(10):1753-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1753.
8
[Multiple slab MR angiography of the A. carotis interna: a preoperative comparative study].[颈内动脉多层 slab MR 血管造影:一项术前对比研究]
Rofo. 1995 May;162(5):404-11.
9
Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography: comparison with x-ray angiography and color-coded Doppler ultrasound.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992 May-Jun;13(3):989-1003; discussion 1005-8.
10
Appropriate imaging before carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术之前的适当影像学检查。
Can J Surg. 1998 Jun;41(3):218-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging.利用大幅欠采样各向同性投影成像的相位对比技术对犬颈动脉狭窄模型进行生理和解剖评估。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):111-5.
2
Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.利用磁共振血管造影术选择近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者进行手术:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jan 26;324(7331):198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7331.198.
3
Should carotid endarterectomy be purchased? Purchasers need a broader perspective.
是否应该购买颈动脉内膜切除术?购买者需要更广阔的视角。
BMJ. 1995 Feb 4;310(6975):317-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6975.317.