Spielman R S, Smouse P E
Am J Hum Genet. 1976 Jul;28(4):317-31.
A set of 12 anthropometric measures and six genetic traits, available for 520 Yanomama Indians from 19 villages in nine clusters, were used to allocate individuals to villages. On the basis of anthropometrics alone, 36% of the individuals were allocated to the right village and 60% to the right cluster. On the basis of genetic traits alone, 16% were allocated to the right village and 26% to the right cluster. A combination of all 18 characters yielded 41% allocation to the right village and 63% to the right cluster. Of the 924 possible combinations of six anthropometric measures, only one provided poorer resolution than did the six genetic traits. We explain the better resolution of the anthropometric traits by noting that the anthropometric traits are not totally heritable and that genetic traits are not continuously distributed. Randomization studies indicated that all of the observed correct-allocation fractions are far in excess of random expectation. We infer that the village phenotype distributions overlap only partially, and that they represent real and substantial population differentiation.
一组12项人体测量指标和6种遗传特征,来自9个聚居区19个村庄的520名亚诺玛米印第安人具备这些数据,被用于将个体分配到各个村庄。仅基于人体测量指标,36%的个体被分配到正确的村庄,60%被分配到正确的聚居区。仅基于遗传特征,16%被分配到正确的村庄,26%被分配到正确的聚居区。所有18个特征的组合使得41%被分配到正确的村庄,63%被分配到正确的聚居区。在6项人体测量指标的924种可能组合中,只有一种组合的分辨能力比6种遗传特征的分辨能力差。我们通过指出人体测量特征并非完全可遗传且遗传特征并非连续分布来解释人体测量特征具有更好的分辨能力。随机化研究表明,所有观察到的正确分配比例远远超过随机预期。我们推断,村庄表型分布只是部分重叠,并且它们代表了真实且显著的群体分化。