Barvais L, Cantraine F, D'Hollander A, Coussaert E
Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Anesth Analg. 1993 Oct;77(4):801-10. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199310000-00026.
To evaluate the variability of the predictive accuracy of alfentanil by using different pharmacokinetic data sets, eight healthy young male adult volunteers were given the same alfentanil infusion for 4 h. Nineteen venous blood samples were taken from each volunteer, and alfentanil concentrations were titrated by radioimmunoassay. For each volunteer, the pharmacokinetic variables of a two-compartment model were calculated, averaged, and considered as a reference set. Based on the infusion profile given to the volunteers, central compartment concentrations were calculated by using the reference set and nine previously published pharmacokinetic sets of alfentanil concentrations in healthy adults. The bias, inaccuracy, and dispersion of each data set were assessed by determining the median performance error, the median absolute performance error (MDAPE) and the 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively. By using the pharmacokinetic variables of the volunteers, the predictive accuracy was excellent (MDAPE, 7.25%). Among the 10 averaged pharmacokinetic sets, there was a significant correlation between their bias and clearance (R2 = 0.996). The reference set had the best predictive accuracy (MDAPE, 23.6%). Five sets from the literature also showed a reliable predictive accuracy but four other sets with a clearance more than 5 mL.kg-1.min-1 and derived from a large bolus injection were inaccurate (MDAPE > 50%) as they underestimated the alfentanil concentrations. We conclude that pharmacokinetic sets derived from large bolus should not be selected to accurately predict alfentanil infusion.
为评估使用不同药代动力学数据集时阿芬太尼预测准确性的变异性,8名健康年轻男性成年志愿者接受了相同的阿芬太尼输注4小时。从每名志愿者采集19份静脉血样,并用放射免疫分析法测定阿芬太尼浓度。对于每名志愿者,计算、平均两室模型的药代动力学变量,并将其视为一个参考集。根据给予志愿者的输注情况,使用参考集和9个先前发表的健康成年人阿芬太尼浓度药代动力学数据集计算中央室浓度。分别通过确定中位性能误差、中位绝对性能误差(MDAPE)以及第10和第90百分位数来评估每个数据集的偏差、不准确性和离散度。使用志愿者的药代动力学变量时,预测准确性极佳(MDAPE,7.25%)。在10个平均药代动力学数据集中,其偏差与清除率之间存在显著相关性(R2 = 0.996)。参考集具有最佳的预测准确性(MDAPE,23.6%)。来自文献的5个数据集也显示出可靠的预测准确性,但其他4个清除率超过5 mL·kg-1·min-1且源自大剂量注射的数据集不准确(MDAPE > 50%),因为它们低估了阿芬太尼浓度。我们得出结论,不应选择源自大剂量注射的药代动力学数据集来准确预测阿芬太尼输注。