Chortkoff B S, Bennett H L, Eger E I
Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0648.
Anesthesiology. 1993 Oct;79(4):724-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199310000-00014.
A greater MAC fraction of nitrous oxide than isoflurane is required to prevent response to verbal commands and suppress the capacity to learn. Speculating that this difference between these agents may be caused by nitrous oxide's capacity to increase sympathetic activity, we tested the hypothesis that nitrous oxide may antagonize the suppression of learning found with isoflurane.
We administered a combination of isoflurane and nitrous oxide at three subanesthetic test concentrations (0.43, 0.56, and 0.68 MAC) to 24 healthy male volunteers. Assuming additivity of the anesthetics, the first test concentration was selected to suppress learning of new information by 50% (ED50 for suppression of learning); the second concentration, to suppress the ability to respond appropriately to verbal command by 50% (MAC-awake); and the third, to provide 1.4 times MAC-awake. Three tests of learning were applied. At each test concentration, we provided 7 answers to "trivial pursuit"-type questions, resulting in a set of 21 answered questions for each volunteer; an additional 7 unanswered questions served as controls. At the highest test concentration, each volunteer also heard two examples from each of two categories (4 words) repeated 30 times (the category-example task), and a message instructing them to touch either their nose or their ear during a specified interval in the postanesthetic interview (the behavior task).
The MAC-awake value for the combination of isoflurane and nitrous oxide was 118 +/- 4% of the expected value (i.e., the two anesthetics were antagonistic for this effect). Consistent with antagonism, the anesthetic concentration predicted to suppress learning by 50% permitted significantly more learning, and the ED50 was 105 +/- 2% of that predicted. Neither the category task nor the behavior task demonstrated evidence of learning at 1.4 times MAC-awake.
Our results are consistent with an antagonism between nitrous oxide and isoflurane; however, the degree of antagonism is small.
与异氟烷相比,需要更大的氧化亚氮最低肺泡有效浓度(MAC)分数才能防止对言语指令产生反应并抑制学习能力。推测这些药物之间的这种差异可能是由氧化亚氮增加交感神经活动的能力引起的,我们检验了氧化亚氮可能拮抗异氟烷所致学习抑制的假设。
我们将异氟烷和氧化亚氮的三种亚麻醉测试浓度(0.43、0.56和0.68 MAC)联合应用于24名健康男性志愿者。假设麻醉药具有相加性,选择第一个测试浓度以抑制新信息学习50%(学习抑制的半数有效剂量[ED50]);第二个浓度,抑制对言语指令做出适当反应的能力50%(清醒MAC);第三个浓度,提供1.4倍清醒MAC。应用了三项学习测试。在每个测试浓度下,我们提供7个关于“知识问答”类型问题的答案,每个志愿者得到一组21个已回答问题;另外7个未回答问题作为对照。在最高测试浓度下,每个志愿者还听到两类(4个单词)中每类的两个例子重复30次(类别 - 例子任务),以及一条指示他们在麻醉后访谈的特定时间段触摸鼻子或耳朵的信息(行为任务)。
异氟烷和氧化亚氮联合使用时的清醒MAC值为预期值的118±4%(即,这两种麻醉药在该效应上具有拮抗作用)。与拮抗作用一致,预计抑制学习50%的麻醉浓度允许更多的学习,且ED50为预测值的105±2%。在1.4倍清醒MAC时,类别任务和行为任务均未显示出学习的证据。
我们的结果与氧化亚氮和异氟烷之间的拮抗作用一致;然而,拮抗程度较小。