Baron B J, Scalea T M, Sclafani S J, Duncan A O, Trooskin S Z, Shapiro G M, Phillips T F, Goldstein A M, Atweh N A, Vieux E E
Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Service, Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, New York.
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Oct;22(10):1556-62. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81258-2.
To determine the usefulness of sequential nonoperative diagnostic studies in the evaluation and treatment of stable patients after blunt abdominal trauma.
Retrospective review of a prospective treatment plan in a large urban Level I trauma center.
Fifty-two patients deemed stable after initial evaluation following blunt abdominal trauma.
Patients with a positive diagnostic peritoneal lavage for red blood cells underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning. If CT demonstrated a visceral injury, it was followed by diagnostic angiography. Attempts were made to treat on-going bleeding by transcatheter embolization.
Fifteen patients had negative CT scans and were successfully observed. In the other 37 patients, CT identified 17 liver, 16 splenic, and eight kidney injuries; eight extra-peritoneal bleeds; and one mesenteric hematoma. Six of these patients were observed. Thirty underwent diagnostic angiograms. Twelve had no active bleeding, and all were observed successfully. Seventeen underwent successful embolization of the bleeding site(s). One had injuries not controllable by embolization and required exploration. Six patients required laparotomy later in their course, but none had intra-abdominal bleeding or a missed intestinal injury. Despite being performed after diagnostic peritoneal lavage, CT missed only two injuries. There was one main complication, delayed recognition of a diaphragmatic injury. Three patients died, two from multiple organ failure and one from a pulmonary embolus; none was believed to be related to this technique. With our algorithm, 45 patients (86%) were spared laparotomy.
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage and CT are complementary when evaluating blunt abdominal trauma. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an effective screening tool. CT may be reserved for stable patients with a positive diagnostic peritoneal lavage to specify the organs injured. Bleeding often may be treated by embolization, limiting the rate of surgery.
确定序贯非手术诊断性检查在钝性腹部创伤后稳定患者评估和治疗中的作用。
对一家大型城市一级创伤中心的前瞻性治疗计划进行回顾性研究。
52例钝性腹部创伤初始评估后被判定为稳定的患者。
诊断性腹腔灌洗红细胞阳性的患者接受腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)。如果CT显示有内脏损伤,则接着进行诊断性血管造影。尝试通过经导管栓塞治疗持续性出血。
15例患者CT扫描阴性,成功进行了观察。在其他37例患者中,CT发现17例肝脏损伤、16例脾脏损伤、8例肾脏损伤;8例腹膜外出血;1例肠系膜血肿。其中6例患者进行了观察。30例患者接受了诊断性血管造影。12例无活动性出血,均成功进行了观察。17例患者出血部位成功栓塞。1例患者损伤无法通过栓塞控制,需要进行探查。6例患者在病程后期需要剖腹手术,但均无腹腔内出血或漏诊的肠损伤。尽管CT在诊断性腹腔灌洗后进行,但仅漏诊了2例损伤。有1例主要并发症,即膈损伤的延迟识别。3例患者死亡,2例死于多器官功能衰竭,1例死于肺栓塞;均认为与该技术无关。采用我们的方案,45例患者(86%)避免了剖腹手术。
在评估钝性腹部创伤时,诊断性腹腔灌洗和CT是互补的。诊断性腹腔灌洗是一种有效的筛查工具。CT可用于诊断性腹腔灌洗阳性的稳定患者,以明确损伤的器官。出血通常可通过栓塞治疗,从而降低手术率。