Jaster R, Wegener R
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Rostock.
Blutalkohol. 1993 Sep;30(5):257-65.
In 109 drunken male drivers from the area of Rostock the marker of alcohol abuse CDT was superior to the established laboratory parametres gammaglutamyltransferase (GGT) and mean cell volume (MCV) concerning the diagnostic efficiency. The prerequisite for the high diagnostic evidence of the CDT is the quantification of the minor band and the definition of standards of valuation by comparative studies with defined groups of probands (alcoholics, normal population). The combination of the 3 parametres CDT/GGT/MCV gave in 67% of the examined drunken drivers more or less strong hints at chronic alcohol abuse. The BAC of 1.6/1000 as a base for the decision to cause a medical-psychological examination (in case of "poison-resistance") turned out in this study to be an interchangeable, incomprehensible value. In about two thirds of the examined drunken drivers laboratory findings were pathological also in case of BAC below 1.6/1000. According to the experiences existing so far the parametres-combination CDT/GGT is unreservedly suitable as a screening procedure for the registration of potential or manifest alcoholics. Because the examinations may be performed from the usual blood samples for the BAC-detection these laboratory parametres really offer themselves for questions of traffic medicine. Further investigations are necessary.
在罗斯托克地区的109名醉酒男性司机中,就诊断效率而言,酒精滥用标志物CDT优于已确立的实验室参数γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)和平均红细胞体积(MCV)。CDT具有高诊断证据的前提是对次要条带进行定量,并通过与特定受试组(酗酒者、正常人群)的比较研究来确定评估标准。在67%的受试醉酒司机中,CDT/GGT/MCV这三个参数的组合或多或少强烈提示存在慢性酒精滥用。在本研究中,作为决定进行医学-心理检查(以防“抗毒”)依据的1.6/1000的血液酒精浓度(BAC)结果是一个可互换的、难以理解的值。在大约三分之二的受试醉酒司机中,即使BAC低于1.6/1000,实验室检查结果也呈病理性。根据目前已有的经验,CDT/GGT参数组合无疑适用于筛查潜在或显性酗酒者。由于这些检查可以从用于检测BAC的常规血液样本中进行,这些实验室参数确实适用于交通医学问题。还需要进一步研究。