• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Quantification of extracranial carotid stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography and Doppler sonography versus intra-arterial angiography].

作者信息

Fürst G, Kahn T, Sitzer M, Fischer H, Hofer M, Fehlings T, Aulich A, Steinmetz H

机构信息

Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Rofo. 1993 Oct;159(4):368-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032780.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1032780
PMID:8219124
Abstract

UNLABELLED

To assess various non-invasive techniques for quantifying internal carotid artery CA stenosis, per cent luminal diameter reduction on intraarterial angiograms (IAA) was measured in 63 patients with ICA stenosis or occlusion. These data were compared with independent measurements based on MR-angiography, continuous-wave (cw) Doppler ultrasonography, systolic peak flow velocity and colour Doppler assisted duplex imaging. Correlations with IAA were equally strong for MR angiography, cw Doppler and colour Doppler analysis (0.95; 0.92; 0.92). Positive predictive values for > or = 70% ICA stenosis were lower and negative predictive values were higher for cw Doppler (0.85; 0.92) and colour duplex analysis (0.81; 0.94) than for MR angiography (0.86; 0.88). Statistical analysis showed non-linear correlations between percentage of lumen diameter narrowing and the length of the zone of signal intensity loss (0.72) and maximum systolic peak flow velocity (0.77).

CONCLUSION

Several non-invasive methods do compare with IAA in identifying and quantifying high-grade ICA stenosis and may suffice for decisions on treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Quantification of extracranial carotid stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography and Doppler sonography versus intra-arterial angiography].
Rofo. 1993 Oct;159(4):368-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032780.
2
Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis.量化颈内动脉狭窄时的方法间相关性。
Stroke. 1993 Oct;24(10):1513-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.10.1513.
3
Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography.
Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):35-40. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.1.1727306.
4
[Area reduction in carotid stenosis of the internal carotid artery].[颈内动脉颈动脉狭窄的面积缩小]
Ultraschall Med. 1999 Aug;20(4):137-43. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-8901.
5
Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.颅外颈动脉狭窄的前瞻性评估:最大强度投影和多平面重建磁共振血管造影与传统血管造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1205-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976902.
6
[MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].[磁共振血管造影与双功超声检查:对血管造影确定的颈内动脉狭窄≥70 - 99%的预测可靠性]
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Feb;127(2):81-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-22031.
7
Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography.颈动脉狭窄:磁共振相位对比血流定量作为磁共振血管造影辅助手段的临床疗效
Radiology. 1995 Feb;194(2):459-67. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824727.
8
Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: agreement of ECST, NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement.彩色多普勒超声测量颈动脉狭窄:欧洲颈动脉外科试验(ECST)、北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)及颈总动脉(CCA)方法应用于超声测量与动脉内血管造影狭窄测量的一致性。
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Nov;56(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.021. Epub 2005 Jun 16.
9
Characteristics and clinical value of an intravenous echo-enhancement agent in evaluation of high-grade internal carotid stenosis.静脉超声造影剂在评估颈内动脉高度狭窄中的特点及临床价值
J Neuroimaging. 1997 Apr;7 Suppl 1:S22-5.
10
Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.筛查磁共振血管造影和多普勒超声检查在评估颈动脉狭窄中的效能。
Am Surg. 1994 May;60(5):340-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.双功能超声用于诊断颅外段有症状颈动脉狭窄。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):CD013172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.