Cattaneo I, Kayser V, Guilbaud G
Unité de Recherches de Physiopharmacologie du Système Nerveux, INSERM, Paris, France.
Brain Res. 1993 Oct 1;623(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91428-u.
In an attempt to determine the opioid receptor class(es) which underly the two opposing effects of naloxone in models of persistent pain, we tested the action of the selective delta antagonist naltrindole, and that of the kappa antagonist MR-2266 on the bidirectional effect of systemic naloxone in arthritic rats. As a nociceptive test, we used the measure of the vocalization thresholds to paw pressure. The antagonists were administered at a dose (1 mg/kg i.v. naltrindole, 0.2 mg/kg i.v. MR-2266), without action per se but which prevents the analgesic effect of the delta agonist DTLET (3 mg/kg, i.v.) or the kappa agonist U-69,593 (1.5 mg/kg, i.v.) respectively, and does not influence the effect of morphine (1 mg/kg i.v.) or the mu agonist DAMGO (2 mg/kg, i.v.) in these animals. In arthritic rats injected with the delta antagonist, the paradoxical antinociceptive effect produced by 3 micrograms/kg i.v. naloxone was not significantly modified (maximal vocalization thresholds (% of control) were 146 +/- 9% versus 161 +/- 7% in the control group). By contrast, the hyperalgesic effect produced by 1 mg/kg i.v. naloxone was significantly reduced (maximal vocalization thresholds were 87 +/- 4% versus 69 +/- 5% in the control group). In rats injected with the kappa antagonist, the antinociceptive effect of the low dose of naloxone was almost abolished (mean vocalization thresholds were 115 +/- 3% versus 169 +/- 7%) whereas the hyperalgesic effect of naloxone 1 mg/kg i.v. was not significantly modified (mean vocalization thresholds = 70 +/- 3% and 65 +/- 3%, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了确定在持续性疼痛模型中纳洛酮两种相反作用背后的阿片受体类型,我们测试了选择性δ拮抗剂纳曲吲哚以及κ拮抗剂MR - 2266对关节炎大鼠全身应用纳洛酮双向效应的作用。作为伤害感受测试,我们采用测量对爪部压力的发声阈值。拮抗剂以一定剂量给药(静脉注射纳曲吲哚1 mg/kg,静脉注射MR - 2266 0.2 mg/kg),其本身无作用,但分别可阻断δ激动剂DTLET(静脉注射3 mg/kg)或κ激动剂U - 69,593(静脉注射1.5 mg/kg)的镇痛作用,且不影响这些动物体内吗啡(静脉注射1 mg/kg)或μ激动剂DAMGO(静脉注射2 mg/kg)的作用。在注射了δ拮抗剂的关节炎大鼠中,静脉注射3微克/千克纳洛酮产生的反常抗伤害感受作用无显著改变(最大发声阈值(对照组的百分比)为146±9%,而对照组为161±7%)。相比之下,静脉注射1 mg/kg纳洛酮产生的痛觉过敏作用显著降低(最大发声阈值为87±4%,而对照组为69±5%)。在注射了κ拮抗剂的大鼠中,低剂量纳洛酮的抗伤害感受作用几乎被消除(平均发声阈值为115±3%,而对照组为169±7%),而静脉注射1 mg/kg纳洛酮的痛觉过敏作用无显著改变(平均发声阈值分别为70±3%和65±3%)。(摘要截短至250字)