Hemminki K
Center for Nutrition and Toxicology, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Carcinogenesis. 1993 Oct;14(10):2007-12. doi: 10.1093/carcin/14.10.2007.
Anyone having lectured on DNA adducts is likely to be familiar with the first question after the presentation: 'What is the relationship of DNA adducts and cancer?'. Although there are a number of reviews on the topic (1-5), my personal response, instead of going into lengthy circumstantial argumentation and hand-waving, has been a quotation from Mortimer Mendelson: 'I wouldn't like to have my DNA messed up'. In this commentary I will indulge in this still circumstantial argumentation. The reason being that never before has it appeared to be so easy, or less difficult, to entertain the question. Hopefully this effort will spare colleagues confronting the same question some time. At the same time I will take the opportunity to describe developments in the identification of DNA adducts. A vivid history of the development of ideas on chemical causes of cancer has been published by Lawley.
任何讲授过DNA加合物的人可能都很熟悉演讲后的第一个问题:“DNA加合物与癌症有什么关系?”。尽管关于这个主题有很多综述(1-5),但我个人的回答,不是进行冗长的间接论证和含糊其辞,而是引用莫蒂默·门德尔松的话:“我可不想让我的DNA一团糟”。在这篇评论中,我将沉溺于这种仍然是间接的论证中。原因是,从来没有像现在这样,似乎如此容易,或者说不那么困难地来思考这个问题。希望我的这番努力能让日后面对同样问题的同事们省些心力。同时,我将借此机会描述DNA加合物鉴定方面的进展。劳利发表了一篇关于癌症化学病因观念发展的生动历史。