Berggreen P J, Harrison E, Sanowski R A, Ingebo K, Noland B, Zierer S
Department of Gastroenterology, Carl T. Hayden VAMC, Phoenix, AZ 85012.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Sep-Oct;39(5):626-30. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70212-6.
To assess the success rates and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in adult and pediatric patients, the charts of 76 adults and 116 children with endoscopically or radiographically documented esophageal foreign body impaction were retrospectively reviewed. Success rates for rigid esophagoscopy (100%) and flexible endoscopy (96.2%) were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Overall, rigid esophagoscopy had a higher complication rate than flexible endoscopy (10% versus 5.1%, p > 0.05), but this trend did not reach statistical significance. The Foley catheter technique was used predominantly in children with proximally located blunt objects. Our study shows that flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are both safe and effective methods of removing esophageal foreign bodies, but rigid esophagoscopy carries a higher complication rate and therefore should be reserved for patients in whom flexible endoscopy is unsuccessful. The Foley catheter technique is suited only for proximally located blunt objects, and its routine use is not recommended.
为评估成人和儿童患者食管异物取出术的成功率及并发症情况,我们回顾性分析了76例成人和116例儿童内镜或影像学证实有食管异物嵌顿患者的病历。硬质食管镜检查的成功率(100%)和柔性内镜检查的成功率(96.2%)无显著差异(p>0.05)。总体而言,硬质食管镜检查的并发症发生率高于柔性内镜检查(10%对5.1%,p>0.05),但这一趋势未达到统计学意义。Foley导管技术主要用于近端有钝性异物的儿童。我们的研究表明,柔性和硬质食管镜检查都是安全有效的食管异物取出方法,但硬质食管镜检查的并发症发生率更高,因此应仅用于柔性内镜检查失败的患者。Foley导管技术仅适用于近端的钝性异物,不建议常规使用。