Storring P L, Gaines Das R E
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, (WHO International Laboratory for Biological Standards, Hertfordshire, U.K.
J Endocrinol. 1993 Aug;138(2):345-9. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1380345.
The second International Standard for Human Pituitary LH (in ampoules coded 80/552; 2nd IS) and LH 81/535 (prepared in the same way as the 2nd IS from the same LH preparation) were compared with the International Reference Preparation of Human Pituitary LH for Immunoassay (IRP 68/40) by 19 laboratories in 11 countries, using in-vivo and in-vitro bioassays, a receptor assay and immunoassays. Geometric mean estimates of the LH content of the 2nd IS (with 95% fiducial limits) in terms of IRP 68/40 were: 34.6 (29.1-41.0) IU/ampoule by in-vivo bioassays; 35.8 (27.0-47.4) IU/ampoule by in-vitro bioassays; 58.6 IU/ampoule by one receptor assay; and 36.8 (35.5-38.1) IU/ampoule by immunoassays. The close agreement between the relative activities of the 2nd IS and IRP 68/40 in the wide range of assay systems studied appears to reflect the fact that both standards contain highly purified LH with similar isoform compositions as judged by isoelectric focusing. Estimates of the LH content of LH 81/535 in terms of IRP 68/40 and in terms of the 2nd IS tended to be lower than those for the 2nd IS across all methods, but the differences were not statistically significant. The 2nd IS was found to be as suitable as IRP 68/40 as a standard for the in-vitro bioassay and immunoassay of LH in the two serum samples studied. However, the mean estimates of serum LH in terms of either of these standards were more than 150% larger by in-vitro bioassays than by immunoassays and more than 50% larger by one-site than by two-site immunoassays.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
11个国家的19个实验室使用体内和体外生物测定法、受体测定法和免疫测定法,将第二个国际标准人垂体促黄体生成素(安瓿编码80/552;第二国际标准品)和LH 81/535(与第二国际标准品采用相同方法,由相同的促黄体生成素制剂制备)与免疫测定用人垂体促黄体生成素国际参考制剂(IRP 68/40)进行比较。以IRP 68/40为参照,第二国际标准品促黄体生成素含量的几何平均估计值(及95%置信限)为:体内生物测定法为34.6(29.1 - 41.0)IU/安瓿;体外生物测定法为35.8(27.0 - 47.4)IU/安瓿;一种受体测定法为58.6 IU/安瓿;免疫测定法为36.8(35.5 - 38.1)IU/安瓿。在所研究的广泛测定系统中,第二国际标准品与IRP 68/40的相对活性密切一致,这似乎反映出两个标准品均含有经高度纯化的促黄体生成素,通过等电聚焦判断,其同工型组成相似。在所有方法中,以IRP 68/40及第二国际标准品为参照,LH 81/535促黄体生成素含量的估计值往往低于第二国际标准品,但差异无统计学意义。研究发现,在对两种血清样本进行促黄体生成素的体外生物测定和免疫测定时,第二国际标准品与IRP 68/40一样适合作为标准品。然而,用这两种标准品中的任何一种进行血清促黄体生成素的平均估计值,体外生物测定法比免疫测定法大150%以上,单点免疫测定法比两点免疫测定法大50%以上。(摘要截选至250字)