Haller R G, Lockard J S, Foltz E L
Biol Psychiatry. 1976 Apr;11(2):175-93.
Two experiments were conducted utilizing rhesus monkeys to determine (i) the effects of cingulumotomy on conditioned-avoidance acquisition and extinction and (ii) the effects of avoidance learning on distal ileum motility in control- and cingulum-lesioned animals. Active (AAR) and passive (PAR) avoidance schedules singly or in combination were employed during short daily periods (less than 2 hr) of "shaping," training, acquisition, and extinction. The data indicated that the control-lesion and cingulum groups did not differ in the acquisition or extinction of an AAR. The cingulum group, however, showed a significant deficit in the acquisition of a PAR and a noticeably slower rate of lever pulling during avoidance trials in the combined avoidance training sessions. The results also suggested that ileum motility and avoidance behavior parallel on another, i.e., if either changed the other often changed in the same direction; that cingulum monkeys seemed to be less "reactive" than control-lesion monkeys; and that cingulum animals may been somewhat more regular in their percent daily motility patterns than the control animals.
进行了两项利用恒河猴的实验,以确定(i)扣带回切开术对条件性回避习得和消退的影响,以及(ii)回避学习对对照动物和扣带回损伤动物回肠远端运动的影响。在每天短时间(少于2小时)的“塑造”、训练、习得和消退过程中,单独或组合使用主动(AAR)和被动(PAR)回避程序。数据表明,对照损伤组和扣带回组在AAR的习得或消退方面没有差异。然而,扣带回组在PAR的习得方面表现出显著缺陷,并且在联合回避训练阶段的回避试验中,杠杆拉动速率明显较慢。结果还表明,回肠运动和回避行为相互平行,即如果其中一个发生变化,另一个通常会朝相同方向变化;扣带回猴似乎比对照损伤猴“反应性”更低;并且扣带回动物每日运动模式的百分比可能比对照动物更规律一些。