Suppr超能文献

支持性牙周治疗患者中反向旋转动力牙刷的评估。

Evaluation of a counter-rotational powered brush in patients in supportive periodontal therapy.

作者信息

Yukna R A, Shaklee R L

机构信息

Department of Surgical Dentistry, University of Colorado School of Dentistry, Denver.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1993 Sep;64(9):859-64. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.9.859.

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of a counter-rotational powered brush (CRPB) during the supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) phase of periodontal treatment, 40 treated patients in SPT but with insufficient plaque control were randomly divided into equal experimental or control groups. All subjects used the same toothpaste, but the CRPB group did not use any interproximal aids. Gingivitis (MGI), plaque, and bleeding on probing (BOP) were scored at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months prior to prophylaxis in conjunction with regular SPT visits. While both groups improved from baseline, CRPB use achieved significantly lower mean plaque scores and BOP at 6 months as analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. The CRPB also showed consistent statistically superior percentage changes from baseline resulting in a general 50% improvement in clinical conditions compared to a 20 to 25% improvement for control oral hygiene methods. CRPB use resulted in at least a 50% improvement from baseline twice as often as did the control. The results of this study demonstrate more substantial and consistent improvement in periodontal conditions and plaque control effectiveness with the CRPB than the control methods that included interproximal hygiene aids. It appears that the CRPB may be a useful adjunct in maintaining reduced plaque levels and favorable gingival conditions in patients in the SPT phase of periodontal therapy.

摘要

为了评估反向旋转电动牙刷(CRPB)在牙周治疗的支持性牙周治疗(SPT)阶段的有效性,40名处于SPT阶段但菌斑控制不佳的已治疗患者被随机分为人数相等的实验组或对照组。所有受试者使用相同的牙膏,但CRPB组未使用任何邻间清洁辅助工具。在基线以及与定期SPT就诊相结合的预防性治疗前1、3和6个月时,对牙龈炎(MGI)、菌斑和探诊出血(BOP)进行评分。虽然两组均较基线有所改善,但通过重复测量方差分析可知,在6个月时,使用CRPB的患者平均菌斑评分和BOP显著更低。与对照口腔卫生方法改善20%至25%相比,CRPB从基线开始的百分比变化在统计学上也始终更优,临床状况总体改善50%。使用CRPB导致至少较基线改善50%的情况是对照组的两倍。本研究结果表明,与包括邻间清洁辅助工具的对照方法相比,CRPB在牙周状况和菌斑控制效果方面有更显著且持续的改善。在牙周治疗的SPT阶段,CRPB似乎可能是维持患者菌斑水平降低和牙龈状况良好的有用辅助工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验