Haug S P, Brown D T, Goodacre C J, Cerimele B J
Department of Prosthodontics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis.
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Oct;70(4):361-71. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90223-b.
This survey of recent graduates and third- and fourth-year dental students at Indiana University School of Dentistry determined whether the prosthodontic curriculum adequately prepared students for the prosthodontic portion of dental practice and whether there was material that should be added to or omitted from the prosthodontic curriculum. The survey evaluated 106 topics in the prosthodontic curriculum and areas related to prosthodontics. On the basis of their importance to the respondents, 59.4% of the topics were considered adequately emphasized, 2.9% of the topics were overemphasized and should be reduced in emphasis or eliminated, and 37.7% of the topics were underemphasized, which indicated the need to increase time devoted to these topics. Most of the underemphasized topics dealt with new materials, alternate techniques, private practice and its management, and the prosthodontic needs of special types of patients.
这项针对印第安纳大学牙科学院应届毕业生以及三、四年级牙科学生的调查，旨在确定口腔修复学课程是否能让学生充分为牙科实践中的口腔修复部分做好准备，以及口腔修复学课程中是否有应增加或删减的内容。该调查评估了口腔修复学课程及与口腔修复学相关领域的106个主题。根据这些主题对受访者的重要性，59.4%的主题被认为得到了充分强调，2.9%的主题被过度强调，应减少强调或予以删除，37.7%的主题未得到充分强调，这表明需要增加用于这些主题的时间。大多数未得到充分强调的主题涉及新材料、替代技术、私人执业及其管理，以及特殊类型患者的口腔修复需求。
