Limitations of peroneal artery bypass grafting for limb salvage.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of peroneal bypass grafting for limb salvage with the results of other tibial and pedal bypass grafts performed concurrently.

METHODS

Thirty-four peroneal bypass grafts with autologous vein were performed for limb salvage between September 1986 and June 1992. These constituted 18% of an overall experience of 194 tibial or pedal bypasses performed during that time. Preoperative and intraoperative arteriograms were reviewed to identify anatomic characteristics associated with successful limb salvage.

RESULTS

Secondary patency rates for peroneal bypass grafts (70%) compared with the other tibial and pedal bypass grafts (65%) did not differ significantly at 48 months by life-table analysis. Limb salvage achieved by peroneal artery bypass grafting was significantly worse (55%) than that achieved by the remaining tibial and pedal bypasses (67%) at 48 months. Limb salvage was 33% at 7 months for those undergoing peroneal artery bypass grafting as opposed to 57% at 48 months for patients undergoing other tibial or pedal revascularizations with tissue necrosis. Four anatomic features were identified that were associated with failure after peroneal artery bypass grafting. These were peroneal length less than 10 cm (p = 0.012), peroneal artery diameter less than 2 mm (p = 0.035), absence of arteriographically demonstrated collaterals perfusing the foot (p = 0.0001), and little or no visualization of the pedal arch (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although successful grafts may avoid amputation in carefully selected cases, alternatives to peroneal artery bypass grafting should be considered when less than favorable anatomic conditions are encountered, particularly in the presence of forefoot tissue necrosis.